• rmuk@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        FWIW, The Satanic Temple is different from The Church of Satan and/or the Satanic Church. To start with, we don’t believe in Satan.

        AI Satan does sound horrendously hellish, though. “You’re correct, and you are absolutely right to call me out on it! I can see now how submerging you in searing hot lye would be unpleasant, especially after you begged me to stop! Here, let me try again, this time paying extra attention to not submerging you in searing hot lye.” <Proceeds to submerge you in searing hot lye>

      • XLE@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        2 months ago

        There is already essentially an AI-Satan cult. They’re called the Rationalists. Unlike your average Satanist, however, they are very irrational, nearly theistic, and exert a lot of control over Silicon Valley.

    • Xaphanos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      The freedoms of others should be respected, including the freedom to offend. To willfully and unjustly encroach upon the freedoms of another is to forgo one’s own.

  • A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    124
    ·
    2 months ago

    tl;dr:

    Maus is a Unitarian Universalist, a pluralistic religion that’s rooted in the inherent worth of every person. In April, she argued that AI didn’t align with her religious beliefs, citing environmental and ethical concerns.

    Just so you know which religion to convert to.

    • rmuk@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      2 months ago

      I mean, hypothetically couldn’t you just pick any belief structure outside of the top ten and make shit up? I’m a card carrying member of The Satanic Temple (which also puts an emphasis on human worth and social conscience) and I feel like I could swing this.

    • stickyprimer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      There were already 100 reasons why the Unitarians are where it’s at.

      But I really don’t think this is reason 101. All we have here is someone who asked their employer for this and was fortunate enough to have it granted.

      That means nothing for anyone else. There is not some national law that all Unitarians have this protected right now.

      So yeah… you might as well try on grounds that it offends Allah, because you’ll have the same odds.

      • A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Amish

        That was my first thought before even reading! OTOH they would probably oppose working with computers at all?

        • ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          As someone who lives near an Amish community, the amount of them I see in Walmart on cellphones tells me they’ve got at least enough loopholes to be shopping in Walmart with a cellphone, so “working with computers” is probably perfectly fine.

          …or you go straight to hell. IDK.

  • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I despise AI, however, religious exceptions for work are stupid.

    Go to work for your church/mosque/temple if it’s that important for you.

    If you’re a Christian, live like a bird in the field, like Jesus says. Go pick through the garbage can and be content in your righteousness. You’re reward isn’t earthly, but in Heaven, right?

    • INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m not religious but I feel like people should have a right to take their annual leave for their religious holidays, yeah?

      • poopkins@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        People should be able to take annual leave for whatever they want, provided contractual agreements and sufficient advance notice. I don’t understand how any of it needs to do with religion.

        • INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Ok well say your company has ten people. One of them is a purpleite and every year the religion celebrates the merging of red and blue, every year - and it coincides with the superbowl. Seven of the ten people want to take that as a long weekend to watch the game. The company can handle this… but oh no! wait, two of the remaining employees are related and share a mother who has people coming after her for personal reasons. She wants to send her kids to somewhere safe so she sends them to west philly. It turns out that’s where the merging happens so the three of them can drive over together. Meanwhile two people have to cancel their superbowl plans to accommodate the purplite. The two related employees get to live safely with their mother’s sister and her husbandi think that this is fine, it sucks for the superbowl crew but that’s not as important as someone’s religion or someone’s family situation. I think if you read this and look in the mirror you will see it all with a fresh understanding.

    • dr_robotBones@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Would be nice if philosophical stances were treated equal to religious ones, so if something is against your philosophical stances you could get the same exemption a religious person could.

    • stickyprimer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Try it. All we have here is someone with a very accommodating employer. It’s not like all Unitarians everywhere now have some court judgment backing them.

  • whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    Trying to start a long, boring conversation about ethics has worked so far to keep people from forcing their slop machines on me, but it’s nice to know there are options

    • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      In a country where most states are fire-at-will. You don’t have the cultural integrity to effectively use something like this.

  • stickyprimer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    “You can now get an exemption” is a huge overstatement.

    Someone in North Carolina asked for it and happened to get it from her employer. That does not provide any firm basis for anyone else to follow. Any of us could have tried this last month with the same odds we have now.

  • fubarx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    Time for the Universal Life Church to step in.

    As an ordained minister (and fully-paid Saint), would highly approve.