• michaelmrose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Notably the risks aren’t simply that this will identify the undocumented its that it will provide a pretext to disappear almost anyone who isn’t white.

    The question is does any given non-white person look enough like one of over 10M people to get falsely flagged given agents a pretext to remove almost anyone they stop. Facial recognition of one person against a large enough database will almost always provide at least on possible match this is especially true if it matches against possible aliens and not against possibly aliens and citizens. EG a query of both will likely turn up Betty Sue Smith is herself and maybe a possible match with Known Deportable but a search against only aliens may return only Known Deportable with agents dismissing any claim by Betty that her ID must be fake.

    • Almacca@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      it will provide a pretext to disappear almost anyone who isn’t white.

      Pretty sure you don’t need a.i. glasses to figure out what colour someone is.

  • Pommes_für_dein_Balg@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    8 hours ago

    It’ll use AI and even if you have your passport and birth certificate on you, proving they’re wrong, you’ll be in El Salvador before you can plead your case.

  • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Targets for what??? Being brown? They need AI to confirm their racism? Was the old peter griffin white/not white chart not doing it for them anymore???

    • IratePirate@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      They need AI to confirm their racism?

      Not confirm, but justify. “Hey, it’s not me - it’s this little machine that says you’re subhuman. I’m just doing my job here, man.”

    • Shady_Shiroe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      You can’t be called a racist if a machine decides it for you, same as if a drone does the killing, it mean you can’t get convicted for murder even if you hit button to fire

      /s

    • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I’m sure that’s what it will be: proprietary and questionable algorithms to identify anyone that might not be a 3+ generation American of European origin.

      • Mirshe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 hours ago

        And to shove justification off to a black box. Awful hard to put an algorithm on trial.

        • SaneMartigan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          They’re gonna fall back on the algo being racist and not the storm troopers with the nazi tattoos, those guys are just doing what the AI tells them.

    • MML@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      44 minutes ago

      Get a disposable camera, it won’t be large enough to do much but it’s a fun little project and you can learn the concept

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      You don’t need a portable EMP.

      All you need is basic KN95 mask and a hoodie. Or you can invest in sunglasses or ID-blocking eyeglasses, like IDGuard from Zenni. The point is to have your features covered as much as is feasible. When I go to a protest I wear a costume that covers my whole head and a jumpsuit.

      You should have a KN95 on anyway if you’re going out among people.

      • root@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        The IR blocking glasses won’t help with normal CV though, right? If you wear those glasses and try to unlock your iPhone, it won’t work because the IR array can’t read the facial features behind the glasses, but if you take a photo of yourself with said iPhone, they will appear as normal glasses

        • NekoKoneko@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Do you have a reliable link to show this? I’m asking not to challenge or sealion, but because I’d like to know the limits of what you’re referring to for my own safety and privacy.

        • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          What do you think what you posted even means? covering most of what it is using to identify is already going to make it drastically more difficult to match

          • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Not really. It’s trivial to match your face. If you use an iPhone with FaceID it won’t miss a beat. You have to cover your full face, head, and eyes.

            The problem with this is that the idea of “KN95 and a hoodie” is that you’d still reasonably blend in. By the time you reach the point t of covering every identified part of your head, you’d also stick out like a sore thumb which doesn’t help you when the camera surveilling you is attached to the face of an ICE agent looking specifically in your direction.

            • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              6 hours ago

              Agreed that there’s no perfect solution.

              But one can, and should, make it harder, and if your head, eyes, and face are covered (which is exceedingly easy and inexpensive to do with a ball cap, sunglasses, and a face mask) it’s going to beat all but the best systems.

      • Aaron@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I’m no expert, but I was under the impression that their tools use not only facial recognition that can (with a non-perfect record) identify people wearing nose and below masks, but also identifies based on cell phone and geographic data. So if someone plans on relying on beating facial recognition, they’ll need to also beat the other tools in use by wearing a full mask, not carry a cell phone, etc.

        • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          That’s also fairly simple.

          Leave the phone at home (the best way to go) or put it in a faraday bag, but yes, there’s a plethora of things you need to do to be completely anonymous.