• RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    124
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    What an awful “premium” brand. They’re the same ones trying for subscription access to heated seats, remote start, or driver assistance features among others.

    What a crap brand.

      • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 days ago

        What’s the difference between a BMW and a cactus?

        The cactus has the prick on the outside.

    • melfie@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      If you willingly paid a premium price for a car where there’s a subscription to use built-in features that even “non-premium” brands have, then are ads on your screen really going to be a dealbreaker?

    • BigTwerp@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      18 days ago

      I leased a BYD seal for the last few weeks as an extended test drive and it has adverts on the screen you use to change the climate control so…

  • stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    18 days ago

    The EU should ban this crap as soon as possible, it is clearly a distraction from driving

    • BlaestEgnen@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      18 days ago

      Given EU have created laws to require physical knobs for key features, I’d imagine this will be stopped as well.

      BMW is the brand that tests for profit initiatives to see if they stick, I recall them being reported to attempt seated heating as a subscription a few years back

  • TIEPilot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 days ago

    If this shit came on while driving I would wreck the car ans sue the shit out of BMW.

    But I’m not an asshole, so I’ll never own a BMW…

  • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    18 days ago

    The most amazing thing about all this is the execs that came up with the idea genuinely seem to think people want this.

    How out of touch can you get?

    • _wizard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      ·
      18 days ago

      Nope. They didn’t think it was a great idea because people will like it. They thought it was a great idea because of money.

    • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      18 days ago

      No, they think shareholders want it. They don’t care about consumers at all. The shareholders are the only people companies care about. The consumer doesn’t matter at all.

    • picnic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      18 days ago

      If you have worked with marketing or brand of a large corp, those people are always the furthest away from the real work a company does. They have no idea of the real customer base, only numbers on engagement and NPS reports.

  • A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    It doesn’t make things much better, but:

    the ad appears when the car is started, with an option to play it or not being displayed on the screen. I suppose that’s better than it autoplaying, but just barely.

    Also, it doesn’t play while you’re driving.

    BTW, according to BMW it’s not an ad, lol:

    To celebrate the partnership with Spider-Man™: Brand New Day, BMW has a special surprise for its drivers. The Spider-Man™ Animation will be available (in participating markets) to all customers with suitably equipped vehicles … bla bla bla

    Once again: since there’s no way of getting around surveillance & IoT bullshit in cars, I’m just going to have to take extremely good care of my old clunker.

    • Badabinski@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      18 days ago

      I will continue to pray for Slate to not completely suck. There’s a “smart” module that has a cellular modem, but it’s something you have to opt into and pay for it.

      • comador @lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 days ago

        Same. I have a 2016 Subaru Outback that I wouldn’t mind giving to my daughter, but like hell am I buying anything connected to the Internet and tracking my every drive (for profit). Slate and to a lesser degree: Rivian are my only EV choices right now.

        • BandDad@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          All electric, modular pickup truck starting at $24,000. The truck is highly modular in parts and accessories as well as mods to turn it into more of a crossover/2 row vehicle. Stock vehicle comes with crank windows and no radio by default. All things you can add (or remove/modify) at any time. It’s a startup, so it has yet to be seen how good of a reception it has.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      This would be a neat gimmick if it came with free tickets to the movie. Considering the price of the cars and the fact that only newish ones get the ad, they could afford it. It might even be positive PR.

  • Naich@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    There’s nothing like the freedom of having a car, trapped in a traffic jam, being forced to watch adverts. At least you won’t notice all the cyclists going past you.

  • Cypressed@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    17 days ago

    I hope the slate truck does phenomenally well for several reasons, but one of them is most certainly to spank the fuck out of these shit-ass manufacturers who want to gaslight us into thinking screens were ever a good fucking idea for an automotive interface.

  • THE_GR8_MIKE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    18 days ago

    I would absolutely hack a car to remove garbage like this. The people who paid the cost of entry for these cars may be putting up with it now, but that won’t go on forever as it slips down the model line into cars normal people can acquire.

    • cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      18 days ago

      I intentionally bought a car with the least intrusive ipad and if a company ever comes out with a car that is all analog I will only buy that car. Honestly the ipad wouldn’t even be needed if they just gave me a place to dock my phone.

    • BillyGruff82@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      18 days ago

      I’d be shocked if it wasn’t illegal to hack your own car by now. People are very authoritarian about vehicles. They’re fine with unreasonable prices, mass surveillance, facial recognition, endless registries, and forced subscriptions (yes, that’s insurance) and eat up any justification the government gives them for it.

      • T3CHT @sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        Y’all aren’t following gear head news, huh? https://www.slashgear.com/2092803/doj-no-charges-diesel-engine-delete-tune/ Yes, I hate coal rolling.
        And I also LOVE using Forscan on the family truckster. Thing is, some big companies think it’s a good idea to make rules about what you’re allowed to access (open software, repair ability) instead of what you can do (emissions, road rules), and that’s the wrong way to have a free and organized civilization, but it’s great for profit.

        Tl;Dr right to repair is right to hack, don’t ban that but do enforce limits on how things are actually used.

        • T3CHT @sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          See also, laws that are intended to limit 3d printing in the name of gun control. We don’t have gun use control in the US, but boy do we have lobbyists with reasons to restrict what we can print. Maybe even some gun manufacturers!

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    17 days ago

    This is one of those things that might actually serve to push the notion that digital devices (including cars now) should be required to be capable of installing independent operating systems, especially open source ones.

    I’d absolutely require military devices to be driven by open source software. And yes, that’s a security liability, but security-by-obscurity is an even greater liability.

    In the case of consumer devices, open-source access would be a means of protecting the end user from predatory software rife with dark patterns.

    • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      17 days ago

      And yes, that’s a security liability

      Hardly. If anything it’s a benefit to security. You don’t have to run all the secret stuff using FOSS stuff. Just anything that runs the hardware (like the OS itself).

  • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    18 days ago

    That’s only fun for idiots and only once or twice.

    The insurance industry, on the other hand, will have a field day.

    I dream of the day all marketing people are flung into a mass grave.

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      18 days ago

      I mean, this is just crap marketing from incompetent idiots.

      A better marketing strategy would be to have Spiderman themes for the infotainment, and i don’t just mean a generic Spiderman wallpaper and icons, no, make an Avenger’s computer UI design that fits the theme, complete with themed sound and lighting effects. The tech is there, don’t just limit it to just displaying a video.

      You could easily do that for different movies/brands without it being seen as marketing slop.

      I mean if they wanted a themed UI from the Agents of Shield franchise they could make a Shield one and a Hydra one. When selecting the Hydra, the lightshow could make it look as if Hydra is taking over the car.

      But good marketing today is a lost art, slap a video on everything, produce a shitload of crappy stickers with the generic logo of the film, produce from low quality “limited edition” collectors item…

      This is just boring, but make the movie universe seem real, and you got a hook that will not only work, but actually be praised.

      • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 days ago

        Marketing isn’t designed to be effective. It’s designed to be hated. While we bitch about this. Spider man and BMW keep being mentioned. The marketing people got what they wanted by being invasive and arguably abusive to their customers.

  • DandomRude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    18 days ago

    There isn’t much luxury in a car that annoys you with ads, is there?

    But hey, maybe there’s an extra-super-luxury subscription that lets you turn off the ads. You know, like YouTube Premium or something, except that the free version already costs several tens of thousands of dollars.

    It’s a win-win: insecure rich guys can feel superior again and BMW gets $.