• surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      No. The idea is to have the constant looming threat of decentralization to keep the centralized system in check.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        No, it isn’t. People will refuse to leave, just as we’ve seen with FB, Reddit, etc. Lemmy.world has already enshitified from where it started, and from the position of nearly every other instance, yet people like you are still there. That’s proof against your argument.

      • Goodeye8@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 days ago

        Except in this there’s really not a lot of benefit when it comes to centralization so it would be better to decentralize to make sure no single instance becomes too big. I’d say world is already a bit too big because 90% of my subscribed feeds would be gone if world no longer federated with Piefed. World has significant sway on our side of the fediverse because smaller instances will probably feel dead (or turn into an echo chamber) if world won’t federate with them.

        • cannedtuna@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          4 days ago

          .ml has a lot of pro-Russia, pro-China types and criticism of either country can lead to a quick ban.

          Functionally, there is no difference. Both run the same software, tho the versions may slightly differ as the devs, who run .ml, push updates.

          For a functionally different experience try Mbin/Kbin (I forget which is the current), or Piefed. Piefed is similar to Lemmy with some quality of life improvements. Kbin/Mbin is a cross between “tweet” style posts, “blog” style posts like tumblr, and Reddit type posts.

          • Jiral@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            3 days ago

            Ok, I get it that there are pro-China guys, plenty of Russian regime fans around as well. But the thing that really caught me by surprise is that there are seriously people entirely serious about how North Korea is heaven earth.

            • jdr@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              Can’t enshittify if you have no services in the first place

        • leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          .world is doing its best to replicate every bad thing about reddit (starting with powermods) while avoiding every positive aspect it might have once had. I’m sure its admins have constant wet dreams about the day they can go public and sell it for parts.

          .ml is trying to pretend it’s not lemmygrad by putting on glasses with a fake nose and a moustache.

          Both are toxic and harmful to the fediverse.

          Similar things can be said of most other “big” instances to a lesser extent (including the one I’m in, but I’m too lazy to move out for a third time).

          Frankly, the only instance I’d trust to not be politically compromised is fedinsfw, and I already got bit once by lemmynsfw’s incompetent management (when they lost control of it to a rogue admin and it closed for months), so I’m not going back there.

          Next time I have to move I’ll be rolling my own private instance, or quitting altogether.

    • Magitian@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 days ago

      Precisely! What’s the point of an overpopulated instance? It’s more likely to affect users because of blanket instance blocklists.

        • arrow74@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          4 days ago

          Decentralized networks with large centralized communities is the best approach. You have to have that number of people to have interesting conversations and engagement.

          But if all the users are spread out across several instances it becomes more resilient. If a large community/instance goes offline or there’s a controversy then it can be migrated to a new instance

          • lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            I vaguely know what an instance is, but let me see if I can get this straight.

            So an instance in the Fediverse is a website hosted either on a web hosting service, right? So it’s like if I wanted to start one, it’d be similar to starting an old fashion forum like phpBB? I’d buy a domain, get a webhosting service, and install the software?

            And the communities are analogous to sub forums? Except instead of me creating them, the users on my forum would create them?

        • Semperverus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 days ago

          It’s good to have it as an option but most people are frustrated if they can’t just go to one place that has tons of people.

    • M137@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      How are you so unable to use your brain?
      The function and idea of decentralisation isn’t to evenly distribute users across every instance, some instances being much larger than others is and extremely obvious thing.