• Dispassionate@quokk.auOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    23 days ago

    That’s the definition of satire. They say it’s not satire. We say this just isn’t a publication for them.

    • Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 days ago

      Right, I understand the exchange. I’m asking you, what part of that headline fits the definition of satire? You keep claiming that it’s satire, but like 75% of what you’re posting is just bluntly/clickbaity worded news, not satire.

      • Dispassionate@quokk.auOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        23 days ago

        The part where it never actually happened.

        Also, if you only read the title, then you don’t get to have an opinion.

        Did you read each line of the article?

        • Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          23 days ago

          I mean, it did though. They effectively said that. The article is a little satire-y, but barely.

          Also, I’m a human out of your control, so fuck you, I get to have any opinion I want.

          • Dispassionate@quokk.auOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            23 days ago

            I never said you couldn’t have that opinion, but I do not value it and I don’t think anyone else should value it either.

            Anyway, this is getting boring and I have a lot of stuff to do so I’m just gonna block this account as well and get on with life. I hope you have a wonderful time!!

        • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          23 days ago

          The title is the part we have opinions of, you bait factory. People read your headlines and aren’t immediately aware it’s satire, which is what makes it bad at being satire.

          You don’t know what constructive criticism looks like.

          Case in point: this actually happened. The Chinese government blatantly said they’d punish criticism globally, as a cute little addendum to blatantly saying they’d enforce a monoculture over irrelevant minorities… like the entirety of Tibet. Their defense of this amounted to ‘we’re already doing it, shut the fuck up.’