• Dispassionate@quokk.auOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    27 days ago

    The part where it never actually happened.

    Also, if you only read the title, then you don’t get to have an opinion.

    Did you read each line of the article?

    • Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      27 days ago

      I mean, it did though. They effectively said that. The article is a little satire-y, but barely.

      Also, I’m a human out of your control, so fuck you, I get to have any opinion I want.

      • Dispassionate@quokk.auOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        27 days ago

        I never said you couldn’t have that opinion, but I do not value it and I don’t think anyone else should value it either.

        Anyway, this is getting boring and I have a lot of stuff to do so I’m just gonna block this account as well and get on with life. I hope you have a wonderful time!!

    • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      The title is the part we have opinions of, you bait factory. People read your headlines and aren’t immediately aware it’s satire, which is what makes it bad at being satire.

      You don’t know what constructive criticism looks like.

      Case in point: this actually happened. The Chinese government blatantly said they’d punish criticism globally, as a cute little addendum to blatantly saying they’d enforce a monoculture over irrelevant minorities… like the entirety of Tibet. Their defense of this amounted to ‘we’re already doing it, shut the fuck up.’