Let’s hope it’s actually true.
Who cares if it’s true? Just ditch windows already
Exactly. Too fucking late.
I switched to Linux two years ago, never looked back and will never ever spend my own money on Microsoft products again. They violated my trust so I abandoned them.
no more copilot: i’m the pilot now
Did y’all miss this past week where they disabled their flagship egg-basket for 1.5 billion people on purpose?
Yeah they made Copilot chromium-browser only for about 5 days. On purpose. Or, the less charitable version is they just rolled out a bug that broke things for a massive amount of people, kept the news reports down, and waited a week before being convinced that was a Dumb As Fuck move.
Everyone has to learn this in their own ways but tech people always get there eventually: microsoft is, and always has been, awful.
It’s like learning HP printers are awful.
To be fair old HP laserjets are still good printers 20 years later… Newer models? Trash
I had an HP laser printer pre 2000, the thing was built like a tank and just always worked
ffs, all I’m hearing is that they plan to fuck with it a lot in upcoming months, which can only be bad news
Plot twist: They’re gonna double down on vibe coding it.
the sources claim that the Start menu is getting a full rewrite in WinUI 3, which will make it 60% more responsive
Oh good, that’ll bring it all the way up to a third as responsive as the Windows 7 one was.
Let’s not forget that Win7 was almost 25% as responsive as Win2k3, which could even hold a candle to GNOME.
“Ok, ok, we hear you, no more copilot.
Meet: sidepilot.”
Valve: We just gonna release linux-based gaming miniPC.
The rest of the market:
Gamers rise up moment
But then sit back down when you see the state of IT retail
Thats the furrys problem, not the gamers
the Start menu is getting a full rewrite in WinUI 3, which will make it 60% more responsive
Uh. I think I found the issue. A menu isn’t even supposed to have various degrees of responsiveness.
Yeah. 60% more responsive for something infamous for taking multiple seconds to launch is depressingly bad. That’s “not even trying” levels of improvement.
The start menu should open essentially instantly (excluding optional animations) – 100 ms is good, 200 ms is somewhat adequate. They’re aiming for somewhere between 400 and 1200 ms.
I hope for them that they underpromise and overdeliver because this does not inspire confidence.
For a menu to take longer than 200ms is ridiculous. At 500ms of wait for my menu to show, the OS is getting nuked.
As for the ‘inspire confidence’,when was the last time MS inspired anything that was not disgust? Excluding the C-suite and some investors, of course.
Some of the newer C# features are nice. Of course .Net is not handled by the same people who keep setting Windows on fire.
Say what you want about Microsoft, but at the very least, it seems to know when it needs to change course.
That has to be sarcasm, right?
It doesn’t say that it actually does. Just knows.
*rename course.
There, fixed it. 😁
It is now couscous
For one, the sources claim that the Start menu is getting a full rewrite in WinUI 3, which will make it 60% more responsive and notably more customizable.
Customizable for whom?
Users? Advertisers?Windows users will be soon, for the first time ever, able to put the task bar on any edge of the screen, imagine that for customization.
That’s what they said a month ago, then they decided that ‘remove copilot from notepad’ meant ‘rename copilot in notepad’.
I remember reading that plan and being shocked about how good it sounded. And then they did the exact opposite of every single thing they promised, which I’m sure endeared themselves to all their enterprise customers.
So sure, I welcome Microsoft’s attempts to finally drag itself back into relevancy, but they’ve got a massive self-inflicted foot wound that’s gonna complicate matters.
“drag itself back into relevancy”
They still have some like a little more than 90% market share. That seems pretty relevant to me.
Reminds me of this: https://youtu.be/OccgHwPwwjo
Well, when Microsoft finally admits they’re wrong they usually backtrack well enough. Think windows 8/8.1
It was still an ugly pig with lipstick but the worst parts like the start screen were gone.
Oh noooooo 8 was much more than lipstick. No, that was a giant inflatable space pig rushed out the door with the body of a moose and Constructed of fine mesh.
Fascinating to watch the car crash though.
Wasn’t 8.1 basically the same except the start button was back on the taskbar instead of hidden behind a weird gesture?
No, the start menu was back, in 8 it was a big full screen affair that was ridiculously big on a 24" monitor
Yup
That was a different time when they were getting the smackdown from Janet Reno.
What ever happened to Windows 10 being the last OS you’d ever need?
Different management.
It is the last windows I needed.
Ha gottem
But it’s true!
10 was the last one you needed. 11 and onwards is neither needed nor wanted. Also people are starting to realize the power of Linux (+Wine/Proton)
That will be the last Windows I’ll use. When windows 10 stopped working then I’ll switch to Linux full time.
Well never upgraded to 11… So…
The same that happened to 640k of memory
deleted by creator
No, it’s not Windows fault. Microsoft has problems, needs to be fixed.
Aww, and I finally just moved over to Linux.
Aww
More like “aww yeah”
Just stay on Linux. Microslop won’t actually fix anything.
If you’re happy on Linux, stay on Linux. This is Microsoft’s “I can change baby, I swear” play. Just like they did after Windows 8. And Windows Vista. And Windows ME.
Surely they have learned their lessons and will never intentionally tank their product in the name of profit again. Surely this time.
We’re truly better off where we are
Lol. Me too. I mean, I’ve been running primarily Linux for decades, now this single press release will have me watching for Windows 13 with interest. (This is hopefully obviously sarcasm - meant only to give you a laugh and maybe help you feel chill about whatever you do for your next OS.)
