• MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Not to give myself more credit than I deserve, but I did test them upon setup, and had restored from backup 2 years ago. I didn’t have any ongoing checks other than to ensure a backup happened. I have since instituted yearly checks of the backups themselves, but I did feel dumb when I realized how vulnerable my data was.

      • stoy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Hehe, I ment no disrespect towards you, I just find that to be an excellent expression to explain the importance of testing backups to non tech people.

      • frongt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        So in the event of a failure, you’d be okay with reverting to that last known good backup from a year ago?

        • MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Yes, but also I have to draw a line somewhere. I have a daily backup process. Some data is backed up to multiple places. I have backups of my backups. I cannot ensure that all three of the daily backups I run are fully restorable. I would love to know with 100% certainty that they all execute perfectly, but at the end of the day I have to trust the tools and processes I put in place for backups. A yearly checkup is probably more than sufficient for my purposes. I’m sure for certain businesses or sectors they need to be more on top of things, but I could manage just fine if all of it disappeared tomorrow. It wouldn’t be awesome for me, but it’d be manageable.