• MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Not to give myself more credit than I deserve, but I did test them upon setup, and had restored from backup 2 years ago. I didn’t have any ongoing checks other than to ensure a backup happened. I have since instituted yearly checks of the backups themselves, but I did feel dumb when I realized how vulnerable my data was.

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Hehe, I ment no disrespect towards you, I just find that to be an excellent expression to explain the importance of testing backups to non tech people.

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      So in the event of a failure, you’d be okay with reverting to that last known good backup from a year ago?

      • MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Yes, but also I have to draw a line somewhere. I have a daily backup process. Some data is backed up to multiple places. I have backups of my backups. I cannot ensure that all three of the daily backups I run are fully restorable. I would love to know with 100% certainty that they all execute perfectly, but at the end of the day I have to trust the tools and processes I put in place for backups. A yearly checkup is probably more than sufficient for my purposes. I’m sure for certain businesses or sectors they need to be more on top of things, but I could manage just fine if all of it disappeared tomorrow. It wouldn’t be awesome for me, but it’d be manageable.