alt text

An edit of xkcd 2501, “Average Familiarity”:
[Ponytail and Cueball are talking. Ponytail has her hand raised, palm up, towards Cueball.]
Ponytail: Open-source alternatives are second nature to us foss nerds, so it’s easy to forget that the average person probably only knows Linux and one or two degoogled Android ROMs.
Cueball: And Firefox, of course.
Ponytail: Of course.

[Caption below the panel]
Even when they’re trying to compensate for it, experts in anything wildly overestimate the average person’s familiarity with their field.

partly inspired by the replies to this post but i see this kind of thing all the time (shoutout to the person who once genuinely asked “who still uses google these days?”)

made with this neat tool

  • tempest@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    I’m of two minds on this.

    In some respects people are learning new things everyday and your take is correct.

    On the other hand it’s so incredibly easy to highlight some text and click search that it it shows a profound lack of curiosity and a lot of laziness.

    • morrowind@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 hours ago

      On the third hand if people didn’t constantly ask this, those search results would not exist, especially for more obscure queries.

      Reddit became the #1 source for search engines for a reason

    • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 hours ago

      it’s so incredibly easy to highlight some text and click search that it it shows a profound lack of curiosity and a lot of laziness.

      100%. People will ‘Google’ celebrities, memes, “Why is my poop green?”, but also just be like “Somebody hand me an answer.” When they risk learning something.

      “The Internet is like having access to the Library of Alexandria, and everyone wants to just gossip about each other in the lobby.”

      –I think I read this on bash.org at some point

      Don’t quote me on that tho.

      –Me.

      BUT ALSO like the others said…if somebody’s legitimately curious, let’s be nice about it because somebody new learning about our thing is a net positive.

    • OwOarchist@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      13 hours ago

      On the other hand it’s so incredibly easy to highlight some text and click search that it it shows a profound lack of curiosity and a lot of laziness.

      Not to mention that this approach is so much faster and more effective than asking a question in the comments and waiting for an answer, if anybody answers it at all!

      • somenonewho@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        13 hours ago

        While I agree on some level that it might be easier and quicker to find out by simply putting it into a search engine I don’t want to deny the human aspect here. At the end of the day social media (and even reddit/lemmy …) is not “knowledge transfer” its about the interaction between humans. So if someone is faced with something new, especially in a thread where it seems to be a given that people know what it is, it makes sense to use that space to ask what it is everyone is discussing. And while a search might yield a generic result (maybe even a better worded explanation) a good faithed commenter might, in the given exampl, enot just explain what Linux is, but also why is relevant to the bigger discussion and also the commenter that orignally asked would have a way to ask further questions that might lead to a deeper understanding of the topic eve it if isn’t as efficient.

        Tl;dr: Don’t just RTFM or LMGTFY someone. Take a minute to explain and welcome people into the lucky 10000

        • lifeinlarkhall@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Absolutely agree. People who are asking questions (in good faith) are looking for a human interaction, not just a Google search. It’s much more engaging for a lot of people to have a discussion about something new than to just read about it. Then if they’re interested they might choose to go deeper in their own research.

          I’m not techy but this goes for anything. “Google it” just shuts down human interaction and someone who is trying to learn. Better to just not answer than to be condescending if you don’t want to engage in a discussion.

      • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        If I immediately searched for an answer to every question that pops into my head, I would never have time to do anything else. I’ve lost days at a time going down rabbit holes.

        On the other hand, asking a question in the comments contributes to the discussion, gives the OP a chance to elaborate from their point of view, and leaves the answer out the for any other passersby who might not be curious enough to search for it anyway.

        One could certainly find more detailed and accurate information by searching for it, but that’s a thread that just keeps on pulling, and sometimes I don’t have the time, energy, or inclination to read twenty different websites to put together the details into a holistic picture while sorting through all the BS. And getting someone’s personal take on it is something a search engine can’t emulate (unless it shows you reddit results, which originated in other people’s exchanges, and lately reddit has been blocking the connection anyway)

        • Geth@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Feels like you are responding to a discussion about a much deeper topic. When one doesn’t know what a word means, it doesn’t mean they need to go down a rabbit hole or make a whole research paper about it. A quick definition or wiki search is much quicker than writing the question on a forum.

          Would it really be a contribution from me and an opportunity for you to elaborate from your point of view if I asked right now what’s reddit? I don’t see it.