• General_Effort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      You’re so out-of-touch if you believe that the EU is against this.

      It’s especially weird coming from an apparent German. You know all that rhetoric about how the internet is no “wild west”. That means locking everything down. Only the properly licensed professionals are allowed to do stuff with properly regulated tools. That’s how it goes in Germany.

      This stuff is what Google is supposed to do.

      • Syrc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        52 minutes ago

        This is a matter of anti-competitive behavior and market manipulation. And historically, the EU has always been against that (especially if it’s detrimental to them, of course).

        They’re in favor of regulation, but definitely not of individual companies handling it.

    • new@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      The EU can fine them for things like this but it won’t make much difference. To provoke long term change, we need a way to block them from our countries and that’s impossible.

        • new@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 day ago

          We can’t afford to start a real war with them because they control far too much of our technology. Yes, we could threaten to block their access to our markets but what if they don’t change their behaviour? Do we go through with it? Some of their services are critical to our daily lives and just one day without a few of them and entire systems would collapse.

          EDIT: Big tech corporations like Google are more powerful than governments. While they are not invulnerable to sanctions, we may lose as much or more than they do if we take drastic action without viable alternatives.

          • Squizzy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 day ago

            The reality is that they are powerful but if they were to become actice participants in some hypothetical war the governments could freeze and withold funds with the swipe of a pen.

            There are a lot of regs around the freedom of funds and stopping that if there is a legitimate national security risk. The US is doing it right now with funds provided from the EU to purchase weapons for Ukraine. The US is not fulfilling orders because they blew their load murdering innocent children in Iran.

          • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 day ago

            This is just looking at the material reality of the problem. I can’t effectively threaten someone who I’m heavily dependent on without present alt. Kinda how Trump got slapped when he tried economic coercion on China. If the EU has a domestic alternative to Big Tech’s cloud services that’s in wide use and easy to scale up, the they can legitimately threaten Big Tech. That said even then that would not be enough given the newly developed dependence on US - LNG. Threaten Big Tech and the US threatens cutting off the gas supply. A gas supply shortage topples governments.

          • justsomeguy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            Their power is fragile though. The EU has sanctioned big tech in the past and will do so again. Sure they could screw us over hard but that’d hurt their profits significantly more than complying and as slaves to their shareholders they will not do that.

            We shall not bow to tech twinks.

          • shrugs@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            22 hours ago

            sometimes you need to be stubborn and disallow all alternatives for better solutions to be developed. trying to use the big tech shit will inevitably always end in enshitification.

            grow some balls, say no and create alternatives if they don’t budge. nothing else will work. and as soon as you have alternatives, everything will get easier

          • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            You think Google is going to abandon the EU market over timely releases of their AOSP code and the ability to install apps from outside the playstore?

            • new@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 day ago

              No, I don’t think so. I don’t think they would ever abandon the EU market. I was thinking more along the lines of a “malicious compliance” approach, where they would make it more difficult for us to access certain services.

              Please note that I am not against fining and fighting Google and other big tech companies. Sorry if my comments make it seem like I am.

              • a4ng3l@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                This is literally their latest attempt at malicious compliance so you’re not wrong. EU will play ball for sure.