At the very least, you’d have to convince both the US and China to stomp it out. And then there are other countries that would be willing to pick up the slack.
- 23 Posts
- 114 Comments
- General_Effort@lemmy.worldOPtoTechnology@lemmy.world•GrapheneOS defends use of AI for codingEnglish53·24 days ago
- General_Effort@lemmy.worldOPtoTechnology@lemmy.world•GrapheneOS defends use of AI for codingEnglish1013·24 days ago
You shouldn’t let billionaires control your life. They may not have your best interests at heart.
- General_Effort@lemmy.worldOPtoTechnology@lemmy.world•GrapheneOS defends use of AI for codingEnglish213·25 days ago
I said “leftist” in quotes. Almost everyone here self-identifies as being on the left, at least insofar as they oppose Trump. And yet… well.
I am skeptical if AI is already having a substantial effect on employment. In any case, I don’t think these people care. You don’t see anyone arguing for a better social safety net/unemployment benefits. Here’s someone saying that people lose their jobs over AI, but you also have people saying AI is useless. They really don’t care.
- General_Effort@lemmy.worldOPtoTechnology@lemmy.world•GrapheneOS defends use of AI for codingEnglish1717·25 days ago
Look at the comments here. Do you think the haters here care?
- General_Effort@lemmy.worldOPtoTechnology@lemmy.world•GrapheneOS defends use of AI for codingEnglish116·25 days ago
Yes. Trump’s deranged acts are seriously harming the US economy but also doing a lot of damage to the global economy. Anyone who blames AI for layoffs is effectively helping Trump/the global right by covering up their incompetence and failure. To be fair, Putin’s war is also causing much harm.
- General_Effort@lemmy.worldOPtoTechnology@lemmy.world•GrapheneOS defends use of AI for codingEnglish410·25 days ago
fighting against something you see as a danger to literally the entire world
Is that what you’re doing, then?
- General_Effort@lemmy.worldOPtoTechnology@lemmy.world•GrapheneOS defends use of AI for codingEnglish212·25 days ago
Unfortunately, having a god complex is not sufficient to make one a good coder.
- General_Effort@lemmy.worldOPtoTechnology@lemmy.world•GrapheneOS defends use of AI for codingEnglish1835·25 days ago
Sure bro. All dumb takes by GrapheneOS, LineageOS, and even Linux.
You understand quality code, unlike Linus Torvalds.
- General_Effort@lemmy.worldOPtoTechnology@lemmy.world•GrapheneOS defends use of AI for codingEnglish168·25 days ago
Oh look! Another “leftist” trying to shift blame away from tariff man.
Eric Lu has published a write-up of how he did it: https://cognition.com/blog/factoring-rsa-260
In total, I estimate that this factorization cost about 4,900 GPU-days, or 13.5 GPU-years, which is about $400k at current market prices.
They are certainly not reading everyone’s mail from back in the day.
- General_Effort@lemmy.worldOPtoTechnology@lemmy.world•GrapheneOS defends use of AI for codingEnglish227·25 days ago

A large number of people are using it as an opportunity to promote using operating systems which are the direct opposite of hardened and are much more heavily using AI models including for a lot of code generation.
LineageOS is certainly using it. CalyxOS, /e/ and iodéOS are based on it. CalyxOS is developed by LineageOS core developers.
- General_Effort@lemmy.worldOPtoTechnology@lemmy.world•GrapheneOS defends use of AI for codingEnglish1110·25 days ago
You’re right, but don’t encourage people to brigade GrapheneOS. That’s a donation-funded project.
- General_Effort@lemmy.worldOPtoTechnology@lemmy.world•GrapheneOS defends use of AI for codingEnglish116·25 days ago
I’ll grant that bosses and managers have a valid role for keeping the work on track. But someone who tries that without being qualified themself will cause major problems.
- General_Effort@lemmy.worldOPtoTechnology@lemmy.world•GrapheneOS defends use of AI for codingEnglish3547·25 days ago
I guess many people don’t know how much programming has changed over the last year. GrapheneOS is doing a good job telling it like it is.
- General_Effort@lemmy.worldOPtoTechnology@lemmy.world•GrapheneOS defends use of AI for codingEnglish13114·25 days ago
Luckily, the “negative externalities” are mostly made-up bullshit.
- General_Effort@lemmy.worldOPtoTechnology@lemmy.world•GrapheneOS defends use of AI for codingEnglish1541·25 days ago
There is really no point arguing about such details. AI haters don’t care how exactly you use AI. If you want the best, most secure software possible, you need to let the developers find whatever way there. Imposing arbitrary restrictions won’t work.
- General_Effort@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.world•Audacity 4.0 is finally out!English111·1 month ago
I’m trying to figure out which model they used based on the style of the UI, but I can’t quite pin it down.
- General_Effort@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.world•OpenAI announces new slop generator GPT-6 Astra: Unfortunately not any better than the last oneEnglish4·1 month ago
Looks like ARC-AGI 3 is just about saturated. Womp Womp
Actually, on second thought, there may be a small significance. If encrypted messages are intercepted by interested parties, they are probably archived for later. If anyone used that kind of encryption (like 30 years ago, I guess) then they should assume their stuff has been read if it seems worth an effort. Maybe it also serves as a warning for the future about current encryption.
GOS is not part of a theoretical future.