• JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Why would a mobile site give a QR code to prove you’re human?

    I think that would prove you’re robot, if anything. I need my phone’s camera to scan the QR code, but it’s on the screen!

    • Varcour@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I got a QR code like that from google drive today. I was trying to create a new account and it presented me with a QR code to scan with my phone. I didn’t try using it on my phone or wanted anything to do with it from my phone. But it wouldn’t let me continue if I didn’t scan their code

  • pasdechance@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’d like an example of a site that does this. Name and shame. It might be the choice of the developer, too.

  • absolutetupperware@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    google and microsoft are creating a fault line in tech. one that was previously only drawn by Apple. now everyone will be forced to either assimilate or decentralize. which ironically is exactly what the internet needed, it’s grown entirely too privatized in the past decade or so. i sincerely hope this results in more people thinking critically about their tech. and that the next billionaire with an “idea” doesn’t just make everyone complacent again. but all i can do is hope.

    • JillyB@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      That’s all fine until you actually need the site. If it’s your bank, payment portal for your new apartment, scheduling page for your doctor, etc. Not every site is optional.

      • degenerate_neutron_matter@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        You can visit your bank in person, send a check to pay for your apartment, call your doctor to schedule an appointment, etc. Not everything has to be done online.

          • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            My kids’ school district provides district-managed chromebooks. I stuck them on their own walled-off VLAN. Out of sight, out of mind. Any time my kids come to me with an issue on their chromebooks, I point them back to the school’s IT guy. Trying to instill the “this thing belongs to the school, therefore any issues with it are the school’s problem” mindset. I’m not rude about it, just very frank.

        • testaccount372920@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          14 hours ago

          That might be true where you live, good for you. Where I’m from, calling the doctor is still possible, but the other two examples are not an option or practically unfeasible. So many services are digital by default, some have options for communication by physical mail, but that comes with extra fees. Straight up avoiding websites if they use these new captchas introduces a disproportionate burden.

  • njordomir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    Seems poorly thought through. Some chump with Photoshop and a text editor could replicate this but change the QR code to a malware site in minutes.

      • XLE@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        23 hours ago

        GrapheneOS lets you install Google Play Services locked inside a sandbox inside a separate profile, which might work?

        The whole system is designed around identifying you as an individual (and until now about making you as miserable as possible until you gave up), so I’m not sure how happy Google would be if you tried that.

        • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Yes, but then you are tracked on each website and service by google. Entirely against the point of having a google free or sandboxed device.

          • XLE@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Correct me if I’m wrong, but I think having a separate profile for just Captcha verification through Play would be more akin to having a separate phone for the purpose. Provided you only used that separate profile for the single purpose, then closed it

            • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              16 hours ago

              Its really going to depend on how many sites use it and how it handles tracking. If its IP address linked, then it just links all profiles on the same phone.

      • 13igTyme@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        But they won’t be de-googled. I assume Google has some sort of Trojan software that remains permanently in the background that users can’t see.

        • BandanaBug@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Untrue. Motorola with GrapheneOS will still be degoogled. No clue where your idea comes from. Motorola is not even Google anymore.

          • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            I think they’re saying that the Motorola phones will have never had google, so they can’t have the sleeper trigger google leaves behind when it has been removed from a phone. I don’t know if the Motorola phones will have the google app store or any other google apps preinstalled, though.

            • BandanaBug@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              23 hours ago

              I don’t really understand. Motorola phones have and will come with Google play. There will just be official support for GOS. That could mean two things: you have to flash it yourself or you could get it preinstalled. Either way I don’t see how the first part changes.

              • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                22 hours ago

                Then that’s cleared up :)

                I didn’t know that they would have the google play store installed, so either I interpreted them wrong or they also didn’t know that.

                • BandanaBug@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  15 hours ago

                  Ah well I wouldn’t assume every Motorola from now on comes with GOS. And if you have the option then it’d be lacking the play store by default of course.

  • StillAlive@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m willing to bet a million dollars that Google had this shit locked and ready for quite some time.

    Thanks Americans for bringing in this administration. Lina Khan was too horrible to head FTC I guess.