Agent641@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 3 days agoDid you check inside the box?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square70linkfedilinkarrow-up1239arrow-down117
arrow-up1222arrow-down1imageDid you check inside the box?lemmy.worldAgent641@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 3 days agomessage-square70linkfedilink
minus-squareheartSagan5@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up3·3 days agoAnd it gets more complicated when we get to the metadata and filesystem structure. So, you technically never get to store 931GB, I wonder what the (average) ratio of metadata to data is? 3:1?
minus-squarebacon_pdp@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 days agoDepends on the file system. If you are using FAT-8; it is 256:1 if you are on ZFS it is as low as 1:4. It also depends on composition of the data stored. If it is Linux ISOs; it is 4GB:64KB. If it is old C source code; it is 512B:4KB on ext4
And it gets more complicated when we get to the metadata and filesystem structure. So, you technically never get to store 931GB, I wonder what the (average) ratio of metadata to data is? 3:1?
Depends on the file system. If you are using FAT-8; it is 256:1 if you are on ZFS it is as low as 1:4.
It also depends on composition of the data stored. If it is Linux ISOs; it is 4GB:64KB. If it is old C source code; it is 512B:4KB on ext4