• Cellery@quokk.auBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    102
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    12 days ago

    Soon all stock photo image sites will close and we will just have AI images for everything. Uplifting news?

    • daggermoon@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      99
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      Because I love companies selling historical images that should be public domain and than adding their fucking watermark to all images of theirs that appear in search engines. Fuck Getty Images.

      • PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        12 days ago

        I saw someone on YouTube made a image archive of a ton of public domain videos and images that is easy to use like Getty. Don’t remember the title though. Was a cool idea.

          • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 days ago

            The “worthless middleman” provides images immediately at a much lower cost then hiring a photographer and a helicopter in another country.

            • daggermoon@piefed.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 days ago

              I don’t have all the answers. I just think it’s outrageous to have to pay for a photo of Kurt Cobain. I fucking hate Getty Images.

              • Cellery@quokk.auBanned
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 days ago

                Haha well yeah, in that case I agree that any photo of him has at this point made the money it’s gonna make and it should be free.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      11 days ago

      Maybe just the ones that won’t sue you for your life’s savings if you accidentally use one of their publicly available images on a random ass website receiving 50 visitors a month will survive. The ones people don’t actively hate.

      • Cellery@quokk.auBanned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 days ago

        I say we just start using text for everything. No more images. Everything would go so much faster. User Interfaces would be so much cleaner too

    • inquanto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 days ago

      This exactly. Whats even worse, is that so many stock sites now try to pivot fully to AI. As someone who regularly uses stock images and videos at work this is so annoying. I don’t want a fucking inbetween platform to AI generate some slop. Now more then ever there would be value in a site that gives me 100% real images. Like say if I want to illustrate a video about Peru i want videos that were actually shot there etc…

      • Buckshot@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        I was looking for graphics the other day and the stock images sites I’ve used before were virtually all AI slop. Why would I pay for that?

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      Slippery slope - straw man argument, nothing in the post you respond to says that.