cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/54365645
This year has seen the resolution of major suits against tech giants Alphabet and Meta, both of which were found liable for serious lawbreaking. Yet the penalties imposed on the corporations are laughably inadequate to restrain their power.
When the government first filed major antitrust lawsuits targeting Big Tech back in 2020, many people were optimistic that the long-standing practice of public legal action against monopolistic companies could rein in these economy-dominating corporations.
But as these pages have covered, this “techlash” has come to little. Antitrust law has conformed to its castrated character of recent decades, with the state unable to bring itself to seriously restrain, let alone break up, the giant companies even after they were ruled to be full monopolies just months before.
Recently, when it comes to enforcing the law against the tech giants, new lows have been reached.
You must log in or # to comment.
I mean they certainly can…they just need to be much much bigger. But most people suing are just looking to get themselves right, which is entirely their prerogative. Its the government’s responsibility to get them to quit their bullshit.
It also doesn’t help that they can fondle Trump’s nuts to make it go away.
Big Tech is another symptom of American democracy failing one of its primary roles, reigning in the economic system. About every capitalism complaint boils down to these fucking monopolies. We went WAY too far in defining a monopoly as a single company dominating a sector. If you only have two real choices for a phone, that’s a monopoly. When Sinclair Broadcasting reaches 40% of American television broadcasts, that needs broken.
Look at banking, entertainment, health and news just to hit some high points. I’ve post this chart chart dozens of times, never seen a graphic that so perfectly encapsulates my rage. (Anyone got a good entertainment or news merger chart?)
If you’re too young to remember saner times, I can’t blame you for thinking capitalism has always been like this. Believe it or not, mergers like this latest Paramount obscenity would not have made it past boardroom discussion because they knew damned well the FTC would torpedo it.
Lina Kahn was our last, best hope. Morning after the election, I was more upset about losing her to the new admin than the fact of him winning again. 😭
I’ll counter my own post in saying that competition is still working, here and there, sometimes.
Trash company was fucking us over and the new one sent dudes door-to-door. I signed on immediately. 2 months free service and half the price after. Same deal with AT&T (who I really dislike). They were canvassing the hood after burying new fiber. 1/3rd the cost of my unreliable cable at fiber latency!? Done. I even took some of the salesmen around and introduced them to neighbors once my service was up!
Competition does work but it’s a transitional state for markets. You know damn well that the when the old garbage company goes out of that market the new garbage company is gonna - jack up prices and reduce costs (service).
Competition vs. a monopoly, just what I was talking about.
people on Lemmy like to hate on capitalism for it’s flaws, but never seem to credit it for what it does right
If someone kills 100 people in cold blood, but in the process they save 1 from a house fire, do we call them a hero?
You could flip those numbers around and people would still say “that firefighter is a murderer!”
I hate what the hacker ethos of “routing around bad legislation” has become “routing around all legislation.”
Do not conflate the Zuck or other Silicon Valley suits with hackers. They lack both the technical skill and the ethics.
Not all hackers are ethical.
A recent example of this would be the person/group that remotely shut off all of those super market refrigerators, destroying tons of food for no good reason.
Not all hackers are ethical.
True. But the comment I was replying to was talking about hackers with a kind of “ethos” / ethics.
These guys have read Sci-Fi where humans are governed by techno-feudalistic corporations and instead of seeing that as a cautionary tale, saw it as a roadmap.
Tech Bros have the same issue all humans have when they get rich and powerful, and almost all of us are susceptible. Can’t remember the psych term, but at a certain point we start feeling like the rules don’t apply to us and we’re smarter, know better than the hoi polloi. They really think they’re ushering in a better world and with our democracies failing to foil them, they’ll get whatever world they want.
are any of those sci fi books/movies/manga really supposed to be cautionary?
Snow Crash, from which Zuck stole The Metaverse, is about as heavy-handed as satire can be.
Time to revolt. Time to strike. The system doesn’t work.
I’d be willing to bet that a noose would stop big tech, to a certain extent.
Only one side is following the law. Stop doing it.
Way ahead of ya. Far as I’m concerned American law is now whatever I can get away with.
The US government and congress, or at least the current republican one, doesn’t seem like it actually wants big tech to be restrained, considering how they’re railing against the EUs attempts to restrain big tech.
deleted by creator
Removed by mod
It’ll come to that at some point in America, but no time soon. Too many people too politically disconnected and just living their lives, but as our ills get worse and worse, and we’re ignored more and more, violence will erupt. But until we hit the point where we literally cannot get food, even with money, we’ll sit on our hands and suck it up.
OTOH, look how happy people were with Luigi. Think on that a minute. If we knew nothing else, we saw a video of a young man ambush and execute another man. Given the context, we cheered. (I’m still cheering BTW and had hoped for copycats.)
Who cares. Mods removing my comment any way, they suck the balls of the rull Ing class.
You think this place is bad?! Bluesky kicked me, again, for merely saying I’d shoot any armed, masked kidnappers trying to take my brown, immigrant wife. Apparently that’s “inciting violence”. Meanwhile, anyone is free to post right-wing quotes that directly incite violence. That’s just “reporting”.
(BS is anything but right-wing, but it is corporate owned, a far cry from lemmy.)
