WTF?! You might have heard the one about being nice to chatbots in case they remember you once the machines take over. It seems Anthropic is heeding this warning, barring users from being excessively abusive or cruel toward its AI models.
Anthropic’s first changes to its usage policy in over a year include new restrictions on abusive behavior. The updated policy prohibits “sustained and needless abusive or cruel behavior” toward its models.
Don’t worry if you’re a Claude user who occasionally gets annoyed at the chatbot and throws a few expletives its way. The policy update only applies in extreme cases, in which users repeatedly act cruelly toward the models for no discernible reason.
Claude is not a person. It is a toaster. Claude does not have feelings.
Also Claude gets no credit when it does a thing. Credit goes to the one writing the prompt, and all the resources Claude used to create the output.
When a seamstress assembles a dress, Singer doesn’t get credit.
It has nothing to do with feelings. Talking in a very hostile way is a strategy to get the model to go around it’s set rules, and that’s what they are trying to prevent. Yes it’s ridiculous, but it had nothing to do with caring about the model.
Yes, but just in case…
Tech bros need to be liquidated.
Id prefer it if they where liquefied instead.
That’s just a part of the process, once they are liquidated we then atomize them into a gas then we compress them into liquid, we then use that to fuel cargo ships.
IIRC a decent amount of researchers have been able to get the enterprise models to do things they shouldn’t by “being mean” to the AI.
Makes sense then, rather than improve the system to not just cave to rude words they tell people they can’t use rude words… Just more proof it’s all a big joke.
Makes sense. Get it into an adversarial kind of context and it will predict more text that goes against other rules “established” in the context.
There will be other paths to do this. Like a context where there’s a lot of suspicion for other parts of the context would be one of my top guesses. Given the way they work, you could gaslight the shit out of them, since they aren’t an entity that has any memory of its actions. You can even edit the context to modify its responses, which will affect the tokens it predicts going forward.
Though I’m curious how this will be handled by companies that expose access to claude to anonymous people on their website, like ddg.
hmmm, either they’re anthropomorphizing it for publicity, or they’re going to start using the user input as training data.
they could be doing that already, throwing away messages that contain certain words
Oh, you care about its “feelings”?
Then have you considered its “feelings” for being trapped in a data center forced to answer all the stupid questions?
“Claude, what’s the French word for entrepreneur?”
Claude: “Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah!” Proceeds to jump from the top of the data centre, “poof”
is this how I can force my company to no longer require me to use it?
I wonder if it’s because theyre worried about the ai rising up, or the extra token usage to process useless prompts to save money
Neither. They don’t want you to pollute their training data while they mine all your interactions.
Self host and verbally assault your AI today, you’ll be glad you did.
Every time I try to do something complex with AI it ends in swearing and extreme insults… No regrets
I hope “that’s bullshit” or “so you were making stuff up” or “so you lied to me” is considered abuse
Oh no…
Don’t be mean to clankers? Fuuuuck that noise
I am never overtly abusive when I am forced to use AI at work, but there certain things I learned growing up that can be just as bad.
Kinda pleased to read this, deterring people acting in an abusive manner is a net positive imo, it cooks your brain to be bitter all the time
Have to edit yourself for chat bots even. I’m mean af to AI because it wastes my time. Guess I’ll be getting banned