I’m looking at dusting off my motion setup. It was an old setup to monitor what my pets are doing in the house with a webcam.

However, I need cameras outside to monitor my gardens and the webcams are not really usefull for that (for one, the’re not waterproof and USB cams)

I try to look for stand alone cameras, but can’t find a good test of them. (probably user error) Any tips on good, safe, cameras for outside? (pref poe, wifi when it can’t be avoided, not battery powered)

Thanks in advance

  • curbstickle@anarchist.nexusM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    Reolink, Amcrest, and Eufy (only for their newer PoE line, they have a nice multi-lens feature and on-device processing for identification).

    • TheInsane42@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Thanks, I’ve targeted the Reolink TrackMix P760 (white) of the one on their own site (black, but at discount). Colour doesn’t matter to much (house is green, so it’ll not match anyway), but I’ve asked around if the colour of the lower part is the only difference (looks like it’s only that, no technical difference).

      Motion should be ablt to access the camera via the rsvp uri. Haven’t found any reviews when used that way. (all on YT show the proprietary software)

      • curbstickle@anarchist.nexusM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Be aware that you may need to temporarily use reolink’s app to set it up first - turn on the ports, for rtsp/onvif/http(s) then you can trash the app.

        I think the HA integration will use the proprietary port/api for setup and you can avoid that way too, but don’t quote me on that one, you may want to confirm first.

        • TheInsane42@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I have some old phones laying around, they can be used for the initial setup. The PoE connection should be completely isolated. (that’s the idea)

    • iamthetot@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Wasn’t Eufy caught uploading data workout consent? Memory is a little fuzzy but I believe it was something like thumbnails being stored in an insecure cloud whether you liked it or not.

      • curbstickle@anarchist.nexusM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        With the app, yes, if you enabled notifications with thumbnails. Using the app and giving cameras internet access is the issue there. Deleted data stayed longer than people expected, too.

        The crappy generated URLs for camera access was eufy’s fault, but thumbnails in notifications from the app I would consider a user ignorance issue personally.

        That said I do not ever recommend using any manufacturer’s app, or giving a camera internet access. Isolate it on a vlan, firewall it off, and use a local open source NVR that you’ll access directly.

        • TheInsane42@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          That was my idea as well, wall the device off, don’t let it escape it’s vlan, but allow it to answer internal traffic. I want to use motion to capture activity, preferably including animals. (WAF, she likes to see what animals visit at night)