I’m looking at dusting off my motion setup. It was an old setup to monitor what my pets are doing in the house with a webcam.

However, I need cameras outside to monitor my gardens and the webcams are not really usefull for that (for one, the’re not waterproof and USB cams)

I try to look for stand alone cameras, but can’t find a good test of them. (probably user error) Any tips on good, safe, cameras for outside? (pref poe, wifi when it can’t be avoided, not battery powered)

Thanks in advance

    • n4sdaq@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      This seems awesome. I have a couple Eufy cameras I don’t use anymore due to their cloud connection and Eufy’s past security incidents. At least one of my models appears to be supported. Those flashing instructions seem rather complex though. If you have any pointers, let me know. I’m still going to give it a shot later. Thanks for sharing.

    • sakphul@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Didn’t know this existed. Gives the flexibility to choose between different Hardware Vendors.

      But do you have any experience on how easy it is to flash this to the Hardware and how good it works?

      • idunnololz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I flashed 3 Wyze cam 3s in like 15 minutes. I have 2 of them running 24/7 at the moment. They’ve been running for about a year now I think?

        Reliability is generally good, I think I had to restart one of them once. One minor issue I found was it sometimes sucks at detecting low light. Not sure if its just an issue on the wyze cam.

        Basically it will be pitch black and randomly decide to switch from night vision to non-night vision making the feed unusable for a bit.

      • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I think coral is not current and hard to get but I don’t watch too closely. Seems to still work! Reolink on camera detection is decent enough for me.

        • youmaynotknow@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I had the coral already, and for the purpose it works pretty well. Still have to see how well it handles 11 cameras. The reason I need the TPU is because the recognition is done by frigate, not by the camera.

  • curbstickle@anarchist.nexusM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    Reolink, Amcrest, and Eufy (only for their newer PoE line, they have a nice multi-lens feature and on-device processing for identification).

    • TheInsane42@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Thanks, I’ve targeted the Reolink TrackMix P760 (white) of the one on their own site (black, but at discount). Colour doesn’t matter to much (house is green, so it’ll not match anyway), but I’ve asked around if the colour of the lower part is the only difference (looks like it’s only that, no technical difference).

      Motion should be ablt to access the camera via the rsvp uri. Haven’t found any reviews when used that way. (all on YT show the proprietary software)

      • curbstickle@anarchist.nexusM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Be aware that you may need to temporarily use reolink’s app to set it up first - turn on the ports, for rtsp/onvif/http(s) then you can trash the app.

        I think the HA integration will use the proprietary port/api for setup and you can avoid that way too, but don’t quote me on that one, you may want to confirm first.

        • TheInsane42@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I have some old phones laying around, they can be used for the initial setup. The PoE connection should be completely isolated. (that’s the idea)

    • iamthetot@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Wasn’t Eufy caught uploading data workout consent? Memory is a little fuzzy but I believe it was something like thumbnails being stored in an insecure cloud whether you liked it or not.

      • curbstickle@anarchist.nexusM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        With the app, yes, if you enabled notifications with thumbnails. Using the app and giving cameras internet access is the issue there. Deleted data stayed longer than people expected, too.

        The crappy generated URLs for camera access was eufy’s fault, but thumbnails in notifications from the app I would consider a user ignorance issue personally.

        That said I do not ever recommend using any manufacturer’s app, or giving a camera internet access. Isolate it on a vlan, firewall it off, and use a local open source NVR that you’ll access directly.

        • TheInsane42@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          That was my idea as well, wall the device off, don’t let it escape it’s vlan, but allow it to answer internal traffic. I want to use motion to capture activity, preferably including animals. (WAF, she likes to see what animals visit at night)

  • terabyterex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    i am not sure what “stand alone” means but unifi protect is self hosted. amcrest can tie i to home assisstant

    • plateee@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      21 hours ago

      The only reason why I hesitate to recommend Ubiquiti cameras is even their cheapest offerings are kind of expensive.

      And although you can run isolated from the Internet, managing updates is a bit painful. (Ask me how I know)

    • TheInsane42@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      With “stand alone” is meant a camara you can use without suplier software (at home or in the cloud).

      I just want a camera that I can use with motion. (unify has local software, but still you need their software as far as I know)

    • Jay@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think they mean a cam that doesn’t need to be plugged in through usb to work, like an ip camera.

      • plateee@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        They gave POE cameras that will just work with an Ethernet cable (although they gave weird POE requirements). Their USB powered ones are wifi connected.

        Source: I’ve had them for years and am happy with the setup.

  • IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m running Dahua cameras. They can pull new firmware straight over the internet, but they don’t rely on any cloud services. All kinds of flavours available and they do run on POE.