GitHub - juanfont/headscale: An open source, self-hosted implementation of the Tailscale control server
github.com
An open source, self-hosted implementation of the Tailscale control server - juanfont/headscale
  • borosilicate@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    201·
    4 days ago

    Opens .gitignore

    ignored/
tailscale/
.vscode/
.claude/
logs/

    Not all vibe coded projects are worth being skeptical of but an extremely ambitious, CRUCIAL component of the web stack should be vetted and questioned when there are signs of vibe coding…. Especially when the author thought it necessary to hide that it is being ghost-written by claude code.

    • eleijeep@piefed.socialEnglish
      4·
      5 days ago

      It’s nice to have alternatives but I don’t understand why we can’t have a fully FOSS implementation of overlay networking without needing a company trying to up-sell us to premium features. I don’t like to rely on companies to maintain a product that’s a critical part of my infrastructure.

    • jrgd@lemmy.zipEnglish
      2·
      5 days ago

      When I was going for a selfhosted mesh tunnel solution this year, I originally steered toward Netbird given that Tailscale (the client) is rather obtuse to connect with alternate control servers.

      I don’t actively use Netbird, but rather did go with Headscale in the end. If you’re satisfied with and your requirements for Netbird don’t include anything that deviates from their setup scripts, I’d imagine your deployment would go fine. My requirements and my strong desire to have everything relevant in my selhost deployments be fully to mostly declarative, and be trackable via git had me finding out how incompatible Netbird is for me. I don’t think I have seen an app more averse to being deployed declaratively, which as it turns out is likely the reason their deployment scripts exist in the first place.

      The there’s the (at the time at least) really confusing and contradictory documentation that describe two different generations of potential deployment of the software. Good documentation is half of what makes software deployments maintainable, and Netbird had (and might still have) outright misleading documentation that will have you looping in circles attempting to figure out reasonably standard functionality like using external oidc for accounts.

  • neutronbumblebee@mander.xyzEnglish
    4·
    6 days ago

    Headscale is a good fit for individuals wanting to manage a work from anywhere private network and monitor via a GUI. Also I suspect for businesses wanting to avoid Tailscale’s increased prices. Works fine with the regular tailscale client as well. It’s all doable in docker containers for security. Does Saml identity etc so you can do the auth via an identity provider. Probably more secure than Tailscale’s backend given their size and recent embrace of AI integration