• TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    28 days ago

    ELI5: Why use /e/OS over Graphene? This isn’t a rhetorical rant; I’m genuinely curious.


    Edit: See below. I misphrased this question.

      • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        28 days ago

        Sorry, I realize that question could be interpreted in two ways: I meant for Fairphone not to try to get Graphene working on their phone. I know Motorola is trying to do that right now, for example.

        • Baaron87@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          38
          ·
          28 days ago

          From what I’ve read elsewhere (seen some comments here, don’t remember the exact threads) the Graphene team has a specific hardware requirement that Fairphone doesn’t supply. Would be cool to see both projects working together though

            • Baaron87@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              28 days ago

              That would be awesome if they do so. I like /e/OS for what it is and does, my FP4 works great after all. That said, having the option for Graphene OS I feel would do nothing but benefit all parties, so hopefully that can be addressed at some point.

            • cunnililgus@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              28 days ago

              Yes, but Fairphone is partnered with Murena (e/os), and there seems to be a beef between them and graphene, so I imagine its out of spite, too.

          • NuclearDolphin@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            28 days ago

            GrapheneOS is also open source. Fairphone could realistically fork the project without meeting the requirements deemed necessary for the maintenance effort by upstream.

        • perfectly_boiled_pizza@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          26 days ago

          The team behind GrapheneOS want it to be really secure so they have specific requirements that the phones from Fairphone sadly doesn’t meet.

          For a phone to meet all of these requirements AND still being everything that a Fairphone is would make the phone more expensive than the average consumer would be willing to pay. I know several enthusiasts (me included) that would pay for one, but there are simply just to few of us.

    • accideath@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      28 days ago

      It’s mostly a thing of what’s available for your phone. For pixels 6 and newer (and I think some new motorolas as of recently) you can use graphene. If you are on fairphone or a bunch of other devices, you have support for e/OS. In general, graphene is a bit more secure than e/OS, so if you have the choice, it’s probably the way to go but if you don’t have a pixel and don’t want to buy one, e/OS is probably one of the better maintained degoogled android versions out there.
      Here you can find a list with a feature comparison.

      • ruplicant@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        28 days ago

        no motorollas are supported yet by GrapheneOS. only new ones projected to come next year will be.

        /e/OS is just a fork of LineageOS, with dubious software choices and practices. LOS is available for many more devices and is the cleaner almost-degoogled (like /e/ and other LOS forks) basic AOSP-like experience with lots of customization to use even in old devices that keep running modern android this way.

        GOS is much more secure than LOS or any of its forks (including /e/), even more so when the latter is running in old devices that no longer have firmware updates. and it’s properly degoogled, with the option to use Google Services in the best way possible - without it having root access to your system and isolated from other apps, if you so wish

        so, GrapheneOS is your best option. if you can’t or won’t, use LineageOS

    • WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      28 days ago

      Hope you use T-Mobile because that’s the only carrier getting full support. AT&T has only native support, while its MVNOs are shown as “partial” (a.k.a. “pot luck” with regard to which capabilities are supported). Verizon is a total no-go.

  • CountVlad47@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    28 days ago

    I’ve been using /e/OS on a FP6 for a few months now and I’m very happy with it (edit: for context I’m in Europe). I had doubts about whether it could run certain apps like bank or government apps but they work just fine. Most of the default apps work well, but I did replace the launcher because the one that comes with /e/OS doesn’t have as many features as I would like.

    Battery life is also better than previous phones I’ve used. I don’t know if that’s because of the hardware or because the OS is less resource hungry.

    One thing to watch out for is it doesn’t have a headphone jack, though you can get a separate adapter that plugs into the charging port.

    • cunnililgus@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      28 days ago

      My expetiences differ.

      The default launcher regularly breaks, so I need to clean the cache, or wait until it succeeds. So for what I can, I use droidify or obtainium. Some apps also dont work properly as they are reliant on google services. Netflix comes to mind first.

      Bank works, but governmental app (ID & payment) dont work, so I am still rel on work phone for those. Check forums, theres a list for these crucial apps and their status.

      Other than that it’s been mostly smooth experience.

    • mortalic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      28 days ago

      I have the Fairphone 6 (not the plus) running /e/os. It’s pleasant enough that when I had to use a vanilla android tablet I was kind of like (is this how you people live?! 😄 this is awful!)

    • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      28 days ago

      I dont have this newest gen6 plus, just the slightly less new gen6 with e/os, but I wouldn’t imagine the difference is huge. Has generally worked about as well as any regular android phone Ive had, with a few minor annoyances like the “paste” button for text often being invisible, such that I just have to press where it should be to make it work.

  • Aproposnix@scribe.disroot.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    I have the Fairphone 6 with /e/os (dumbest name and annoying to type IMHO) and though i love it, I don’t trust the business side of Murena. In one recent patch, they removed the seedvault backup app and replaced it with their own backup solution that depends on their own cloud service. Another point is that the support overall is chaotic between Fairphone (the hardware) and Murena. I literally was told to raise tickets to both companies when my WiFi stopped working properly because of the mentioned patch (still no fix - only a the compromises privacy).

  • WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    28 days ago

    No Verizon support makes it incompatible with my absolutely essential truly unlimited data via their Visible subsidiary. My job takes me away from home far too much to go without it.

  • NewOldGuard@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    28 days ago

    I want to love this but I can’t compromise my security for this device. If y’all ever add MTE and the other features required by Graphene I’ll be the first in line

    • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      Fair enough. But too many people think privacy and security are the same thing.

      GrapheneOS is dedicated to both privacy and security, whereas e/os (while it does have some security improvements over stock android) is much more focused on the privacy side of things.

      • Zarobi@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        28 days ago

        There is some overlap. Can’t have privacy problems if everything’s encrypted and they have no access to your data in the first place

        • iopq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          28 days ago

          You can still have privacy issues. For example, everything’s encrypted, but you’re the only one with the exact fingerprint so every adveriser and government agency knowns who you are