• Eq0@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    16 days ago

    The root of why Europeans could claim the land in the Americas: it wasn’t developed, thus it wasn’t used, thus it wasn’t owned by anyone else. No matter all the hunter gatherers that were making a living out of the land. No matter even the earth works that could be found indicating use. There were no buildings, thus it was up for grabs.

    • blackbelt352@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      16 days ago

      Tbf, putting buildings up signalling use didn’t suddenly cause conquerors of any geographic to suddenly respect that the land was already in use. See: Roman Imperial Expansionism, Mongol Empire, numerous Chinese dynasties, the Aztecs, the Nazis, the British Empire, the East India Companies, the Zulu, Mali (well Mansa Musa basically destabilized gold wherever he went).

        • blackbelt352@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 days ago

          Yeah, the state of Israel is doing the same thing today, but still, my point was about history of “buildings on land = respect for development” is nonsensical in how early geopolitics worked. I’ll admit pointing to the Nazis, while they clearly showed the same disregard of buildings meaning development so don’t invade, did not predate European colonialism in the Americas.

    • Jiral@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      So many false statements in one paragraph, even on a post that is presumably questioning the narrative.

    • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      Uh, I currently live a couple miles from a city American Indians built out of cement houses. Before the plague killed them all, thousands of people lived here.

      The surviving tribes survived because they weren’t in the city.