It’s just a silly anime girl showing up on first page load. If you’re deathly afraid of seeming unprofessional, that’s gonna do your head in…
- 0 Posts
- 8 Comments
- trem@lemmy.blahaj.zonetoTechnology@lemmy.world•GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billingEnglish1·15 hours ago
I mean, even then, they could increase the price per token, if they want to hand out fewer tokens for the price paid.
They could make this work like a prepaid SIM card, where you charge it with e.g. $10 and then you can use it until the $10 are used up.
Instead, they make it work like in-game currencies in scammy free-to-play games. Except that they didn’t choose a confusing conversion rate, for some reason…
- trem@lemmy.blahaj.zonetoTechnology@lemmy.world•GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billingEnglish9·1 day ago
Yeah, I imagine that they did try. But it’s not just the intentionally misleading announcement post, they also have 5(?) different subscription tiers, which get different changes from this. And one of the subscription tiers is actually called “Pro+”, so that does not mean “Pro and more expensive tiers” like I wondered. And they have this ridiculous intermediate currency to make things even more confusing.
Their offering itself is overly complex and confusing…
- trem@lemmy.blahaj.zonetoTechnology@lemmy.world•GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billingEnglish16·1 day ago
Man, they couldn’t have communicated this more confusingly, if they tried.
- trem@lemmy.blahaj.zonetoTechnology@lemmy.world•GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billingEnglish7·1 day ago
Which is a crime, by the way, when you sell it together with a product you hold a monopoly for: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tying_(commerce)
- trem@lemmy.blahaj.zonetoTechnology@lemmy.world•GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billingEnglish4·1 day ago
So, did they use AI tools to type “LGTM” 400 times or nah?
But yeah, I also find that frustrating. Management just looks at terrible metrics like PRs closed or lines of code produced.
It’s not even novel that you can produce terrible code very quickly. Decades ago, our industry learned that it isn’t worth it, because you suffer for it later. Now the game is altered slightly and management demands that we throw all these learnings out the window.
- trem@lemmy.blahaj.zonetoTechnology@lemmy.world•GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billingEnglish6·2 days ago
Well, base prices stay the same. They seem to just be billing more per usage on top of that…
Yeah, the big thing is that management has no sense how little coding you actually do in a software engineering role. You spend so much more time understanding requirements, understanding how you can resolve roadblocks within your organization and understanding what the hell the code does that was previously written.
In particular, the last part is something that will most definitely take longer for vibecoded programs.
The code is often needlessly complex, because:
But you also just don’t have human beings that made all the detail decisions and can tell you why they’re important. In vibecoded code, all of these detail decisions are accidental and only ‘proven’ in so far as the given accidental state that the code is in, happens to not explode in reality. If you need to tweak anything about it, you’re completely blind as to what’s actually important and what’s just in there, because the AI figured, it’s the most likely thing to autocomplete there.