Not disagreeing at all. The mass unemployment of a bunch of industries is terrible. I’m just saying the other side of the coin is also terrible, that we’re heading towards a world where humans have lost the ability to perform important skills to (potentially hostile) chatbots (owned by billionaires) that we won’t be able to properly manage or oversee. That’s the flip side of most ‘positive’ AI stories: ‘AI is better at detecting early breast cancer… And the doctors that use AI have gotten worse because of it.’
soratoyuki
- 0 Posts
- 3 Comments
Joined 19 days ago
Cake day: April 13th, 2026
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
- soratoyuki@piefed.socialtoTechnology@lemmy.world•Even experts are surprised by AI’s latest ‘vibe-mathing’ advanceEnglish3·4 days ago
- soratoyuki@piefed.socialtoTechnology@lemmy.world•Even experts are surprised by AI’s latest ‘vibe-mathing’ advanceEnglish10·4 days ago
Not just that the next generation of experts will hypothetically be employed as baristas, but I don’t think people take the risk of deskilling enough. The next generation of would-be experts won’t be as good at whatever because they’ve learned to rely on AI. We risk effectively transferring valuable skills from humans to Musk- or Altman-owned chatbots. That should horrify everyone.
Nice.