That sounds so inefficient. They have Palantier and still need to ask you for what you have done on social media?
- 0 Posts
- 6 Comments
- redballooon@lemmy.worldtoPrivacy@lemmy.world•Has America Become the Scariest Country in the World to Visit?English2·1 day ago
- redballooon@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.world•Meta Insiders Convinced Muse Is Going to End Up Leaking the Bank Accounts and Email Archives They’re Vacuuming Up From Users: "It's inevitable."English2·2 days ago
I only use tokens from pure inference providers. Those that don’t have training in their business model.
Our society is very very good at ignoring inconvenient truths. Even when it becomes so obvious it can’t possibly not be seen, we’ll rather invent conspiracies and hunt scapegoats than even acknowledge the actual problem.
- redballooon@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.world•Florida woman used Claude as a diary, then Anthropic reported an entry to policeEnglish11·3 days ago
Notepad doesn’t answer and doesn’t agree as eagerly.
- redballooon@lemmy.worldtoPrivacy@lemmy.world•Backflip: Apple now wants to train AI models with user data after allEnglish1·4 days ago
Fine, you don’t trust them to keep a contract.
With that mindset you can’t even open a bank account or do any other daily business. Or can you? Why trust those contracts but not Apple or Google’s?
Google is quite specific how they’re using your private data, and Apple as well. You can look into the contract and choose.
Meta has their scandal and has proven untrustworthy. Zuck very first known comments from Facebook success shows how he dismisses his users as idiots. But Google? They were even explicit when they were fine with evil.
And Apple at least has a plausible business concept to not automatically assume they must lie. So, what’s the reason other than “they might lie”, which applies to your bank and doctors as well?
But the data transubstantiates into AI godhood not unlike like Heracles, Jesus or the Prophet when the cloud embraced then and took them to their respective heavens.