Even if you were somehow able to overcome the “can” question, the far more meaningful question is “will it do so fairly”, and it’s absolutely certain it will not. If you agree the problem of the justice system is that rich people own it, this is not the solution to that problem. This literally is that problem.
- 0 Posts
- 3 Comments
- cecilkorik@lemmy.catoTechnology@lemmy.world•Exclusive: Can AI judge journalism? A Thiel-backed startup says yes, even if it risks chilling whistleblowersEnglish1·3 days ago
He’s still right that it’s weird people like you are going to bat to defend them. Microsoft sucks. It must get tiring if you have to call out every inaccurate thing everyone says to try to tear them down. The important take-home message is that we need to tear them down, they suck.
You don’t see people bothering to defend Epstein, for example. Even though there’s lots of inaccurate stuff going around, there’s enough accurate stuff to be absolutely confident he was an absolute loathsome piece of shit not worth defending. Not worth the effort to defend. Why bother?
What do you see in Microsoft that you think is worth defending? Github is shit, and it’s evil. Let it go.
That’s not athleticism, that’s a different sport. I can beat marathon runners too when I use a bicycle.