- 10 Posts
- 12 Comments
- UnLocoPoco@lemmy.worldOPtoTechnology@lemmy.world•India Orders GitHub to Remove Jack Dorsey's Bitchat Repositories Under IT ActEnglish6·2 days ago
Happy to report that as of a few hours ago, the protest has achieved the targets
- UnLocoPoco@lemmy.worldOPtoTechnology@lemmy.world•India Orders GitHub to Remove Jack Dorsey's Bitchat Repositories Under IT ActEnglish22·3 days ago
Mirror mirror mirror. How many are they gonna take down🗿
- UnLocoPoco@lemmy.worldOPtoPrivacy@lemmy.world•Should intelligence agencies be allowed to train AI on citizens' data?English2·14 days ago
But the unfortunate truth is, who will oversee that it’s being followed. Time and time again has shown that these agencies have different power on paper and unofficially…take the NSA or the CIA or literally any intelligence agency around the world and you’ll find the same pattern
- UnLocoPoco@lemmy.worldOPtoTechnology@lemmy.world•Telegram's t.me domain placed on serverHold, breaking links worldwideEnglish7·14 days ago
Yup. IdentityDigital has confirmed its due to OFAC compliance. Presumably due to telegram not complying with the takedown order of the channel, registry (IdentityDigital) Was forced to suspend the entire t.me domain for compliance
- UnLocoPoco@lemmy.worldtoPrivacy@programming.dev•EU Chat Control Is Back - And This Time It Might Actually Pass1·18 days ago
Update: A few provisions of chat control 1.0 has unfortunately passed today along with amendments to two provisions. Details: https://thecybersecguru.com/news/eu-chat-control-2026-guide/
- UnLocoPoco@lemmy.worldtoPrivacy@programming.dev•EU Chat Control Is Back - And This Time It Might Actually Pass1·20 days ago
New update: The expedited procedure has been approved, and a subsequent vote on Chat Control 1.0 is scheduled for this Thursday.
The vote tallies were as follows:
For: 331
Against: 304
Abstentions: 11
- UnLocoPoco@lemmy.worldOPtoTechnology@lemmy.world•Apple's Hide My Email vulnerability reportedly exposes users' real email addressesEnglish1·24 days ago
Same. Duck.com is blocked for a lot of sites. Many block it
- UnLocoPoco@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.world•Meta Removes Face-Recognition System From Its Smart Glasses, Is Mad About itEnglish3·2 months ago
On the internet every company does User profiling mainly for advert purposes…its impossible to escape these days but what’s most concerning about glasses was face data was pretty easily made available by the user…still advert and tracking cookies can be blocked…but meta glass camera? Which is basically one of its most highpoint feature? I doubt anyone will heights to block it physically considering that they cost an arm and a leg
- UnLocoPoco@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.world•Meta Removes Face-Recognition System From Its Smart Glasses, Is Mad About itEnglish21·2 months ago
Wait…does this mean every time someone wearing a meta glass looked at me…rather its camera looked at me, meta stored my face for profiling purposes regardless of me being an user of meta Apps or not?? This is so messed up. Initially I thought that only friends of meta users used to get profiled via face recognition…wtf…but again it’s meta…violated multiple privacy laws and as such…so not a surprise tbh
Update: GitHub has started sending notices to users who forked the bitchat repo, requesting them to take them down due to Indian government order