The fact that it uses a non-trivial neural network. If it was simply a rate count of based on a corpus of how much time each word is followed by each it wouldn’t be stronger than keyboard word predictions. To make accurate suggestions requires emergence of primitive reasoning on the semantics of the tokens, LLM neural networks (transformers) can be analyzed to find subnetworks dedicated to modeling reality. It is still probability, but saying it’s just probability is not faithful
- 0 Posts
- 4 Comments
Joined 5 months ago
Cake day: November 24th, 2025
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
- SlimePirate@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoTechnology@lemmy.world•I Asked AI to Count My Carbs 27,000 Times. It Couldn’t Give Me the Same Answer Twice.English11·13 hours ago
- SlimePirate@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoTechnology@lemmy.world•I Asked AI to Count My Carbs 27,000 Times. It Couldn’t Give Me the Same Answer Twice.English5·13 hours ago
That it is not a calculator and is horrible at determinism is not debatable, however its (very biased) huge knowledge is its core feature
- SlimePirate@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoTechnology@lemmy.world•AI may be coming to Windows 11’s Clock app as Microsoft turns it into a focus toolEnglish1·13 hours ago
no issur on android firefox + ublock
If you recognize there’s emergence, the “it’s just probability” take is misleading