Backing up/transferring stuff is my only roadblock
- 0 Posts
- 7 Comments
- Passerby6497@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.world•Google Starts Scanning All Your Photos As New Update Goes LiveEnglish2·1 day ago
- Passerby6497@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.world•Google Starts Scanning All Your Photos As New Update Goes LiveEnglish21·1 day ago
It’s also opt in
For now.
I’ve been dragging my feet moving to grapheneOS, but shit like this is going to encourage me to make the jump sooner than later
- Passerby6497@lemmy.worldtoProgrammer Humor@programming.dev•tech never works for longEnglish2·1 day ago
Zigbee bulbs, third reality and sengeled (sp?) are most of what I have attached to my home assistant. Stay away from the WiFi shit tho
- Passerby6497@lemmy.worldtoProgrammer Humor@programming.dev•tech never works for longEnglish4·1 day ago
I just started writing up invoices for my side hustle and quoting prices to fix their shit.
I do that for a day job, so I have no interest in working more for free. Putting a price tag on the help definitely helped cut down how much bullshit they tried to get me to do
- Passerby6497@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.world•The AI Doomers Who Are Playing With FireEnglish1·3 days ago
I think they’re hoping that reaches more of a steady state
With how quickly tech advances and hardware degrades under heavy use, they’re going to be pushing that rock up a hill for a good while lol
- Passerby6497@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.world•Recent advances push Big Tech closer to the Q-Day danger zoneEnglish0·5 days ago
Relevant paragraph:
PQC readiness “is mostly actuarial/risk management—even if the chance of building a CRQC by, say, 2030 is very low (say 5 percent), the downside risk is huge,” he explained. “Combine that with very long transition engineering times, and you should have started already.”
Also, relevant paragraph from the wiki page for integer factorization records:
The largest number reliably factored by Shor’s algorithm, rather than some other quantum method, is 21 which was factored in 2012.[26][27] The number 15 had previously been factored by several labs and subsequent attempts to factorise 35 failed.[27
And a relevant excerpt from this study looking at “factored” primes above 21
Large-scale fault-tolerant quantum computers capable of implementing Shor’s algorithm are not yet available, preventing relevant benchmarking experiments. Recently, several authors have attempted quantum factorizations via reductions to SAT or similar NP-hard problems. While this approach may shed light on algorithmic approaches for quantum solutions to NP-hard problems, in this paper we study and question its practicality. We find no evidence that this is a viable path toward factoring large numbers, even for scalable fault-tolerant quantum computers, as well as for various quantum annealing or other special purpose quantum hardware.
I’ll be concerned when we start seeing primes being factored when they’re not using compiled Shor algorithm primes. So far, most of the big “factorization records” cheat and use primes with only the LSBs differing, and aren’t remotely close to anything used in a real RSA prime. There was a good discussion of it on Security Now episode 1034 for those who are interested.
“Hey, the massive spy machine isn’t supposed to be used on us!”