They’re advocating for transparency and for states to be able to have their own AI laws. I see that as positive. And as part of that transparency, Anthropic publishes its system prompts, which go through with every message. They devote a significant portion to mental health, suicide prevention, not enabling mania, etc. So I wouldn’t say they see it as “acceptable.”
Hackworth
- 0 Posts
- 4 Comments
Joined 7 months ago
Cake day: October 9th, 2025
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
- Hackworth@piefed.catoTechnology@lemmy.world•AI safety leader says 'world is in peril' and quits to study poetryEnglish1·3 months ago
- Hackworth@piefed.catoTechnology@lemmy.world•AI safety leader says 'world is in peril' and quits to study poetryEnglish0·3 months ago
FWIW, Anthropic did just fund a pro-regulation super PAC to oppose OpenAI’s/Plantir’s pro-Trump/anti-regulation PAC, and:
The Pentagon is at odds with artificial-intelligence developer Anthropic over safeguards that would prevent the government from deploying its technology to target weapons autonomously and conduct U.S. domestic surveillance. Reuters
But I kinda doubt they’ll be able to play the good guy for long.

Death to Chronos?