Literally not at all what I said. Put that shit back in your ass where it belongs.
- 0 Posts
- 18 Comments
- DisgruntledGorillaGang@reddthat.comtoNot The Onion@lemmy.world•Prego Pivots From Budget-Tier Pasta Sauce to Small Microphones That Listen to Your Family's Intimate ConversationsEnglish1·7 hours ago
Why would you not just use a normal fucking voice recorder? Or the fucking phone you have in your pocket? Why this creepy-ass pasta-sauce branded device?
- DisgruntledGorillaGang@reddthat.comtoTechnology@lemmy.world•This Scammer Used an AI-Generated MAGA Girl to Grift ‘Super Dumb’ MenEnglish12·7 hours ago
That law was added when guns were so imprecise it was difficult to hit the broadside of a barn from inside the barn.
How is that not blatantly false? Piss off troll.
And millions of people enjoy trash mobile games that throw microtransactions at you every couple of minutes. Popularity is not an indicator of quality.
- DisgruntledGorillaGang@reddthat.comtoTechnology@lemmy.world•This Scammer Used an AI-Generated MAGA Girl to Grift ‘Super Dumb’ MenEnglish12·7 hours ago
They weren’t idiots either. They weren’t stupid enough to think technology was static and would never improve, firearms technology was literally improving during their lifetime. They wrote the constitution the way they did deliberately. The constitution was meant to be a living document, true, but the only reason to change that amendment is, simply put, fascism.
- DisgruntledGorillaGang@reddthat.comtoTechnology@lemmy.world•This Scammer Used an AI-Generated MAGA Girl to Grift ‘Super Dumb’ MenEnglish12·8 hours ago
That law was added when guns were so imprecise it was difficult to hit the broadside of a barn from inside the barn.
That’s blatantly false. Timothy Murphy killed a British officer during the Revolutionary War at a distance of 300-400 yards. They absolutely had the capability of precise marksmanship at the time the constitution was written. Repeating rifles were not a foreign concept either. They weren’t common yet, but there was no reason for them to believe the technology wouldn’t be improved.
- DisgruntledGorillaGang@reddthat.comtoTechnology@lemmy.world•Nintendo sued by players who say they should get any tariff refunds received by the US governmentEnglish11·8 hours ago
No, you are. Literally read the goddamn title of the thread.
- DisgruntledGorillaGang@reddthat.comtoTechnology@lemmy.world•Nintendo sued by players who say they should get any tariff refunds received by the US governmentEnglish1·8 hours ago
They enforce plenty of draconian shit just fine, I think they can find a way.
- DisgruntledGorillaGang@reddthat.comtoTechnology@lemmy.world•Nintendo sued by players who say they should get any tariff refunds received by the US governmentEnglish21·10 hours ago
That’s the entirety of this thread, that if companies are being reimbursed, then people should also be reimbursed.
- DisgruntledGorillaGang@reddthat.comtoTechnology@lemmy.world•Nintendo sued by players who say they should get any tariff refunds received by the US governmentEnglish1·10 hours ago
And the company should be legally held responsible go reimbursing its customers.
- DisgruntledGorillaGang@reddthat.comtoTechnology@lemmy.world•Nintendo sued by players who say they should get any tariff refunds received by the US governmentEnglish61·11 hours ago
Everybody involved should be at 0 tarrifs. Why should Nintendo be +1 and all their customers be -1?
- DisgruntledGorillaGang@reddthat.comtoTechnology@lemmy.world•Nintendo sued by players who say they should get any tariff refunds received by the US governmentEnglish1·11 hours ago
There’s records of customers buying products at inflated costs due to the tariffs as well. They absolutely can refund people if they get a refund.
- DisgruntledGorillaGang@reddthat.comtoTechnology@lemmy.world•Nintendo sued by players who say they should get any tariff refunds received by the US governmentEnglish1·11 hours ago
The company paid for it initially, but the customer actually paid for it.
- DisgruntledGorillaGang@reddthat.comtoTechnology@lemmy.world•Nintendo sued by players who say they should get any tariff refunds received by the US governmentEnglish4·11 hours ago
Lmao, what? The fucking death penalty? This shit is so backwards man.
- DisgruntledGorillaGang@reddthat.comtoTechnology@lemmy.world•Nintendo sued by players who say they should get any tariff refunds received by the US governmentEnglish161·11 hours ago
Just because something is legal that doesn’t make it just.
- DisgruntledGorillaGang@reddthat.comtoTechnology@lemmy.world•Google Starts Scanning All Your Photos As New Update Goes LiveEnglish1·1 day ago
That doesn’t mean it’s difficult to install though.
- DisgruntledGorillaGang@reddthat.comtoTechnology@lemmy.world•Stop Killing Games delivers 'absolutely incredible' hearing in European Parliament: 'There was no [parliament member] that wasn't responding positively'English5·1 day ago
The people who make the games dont give a fuck about you. Why the fuck do you think we would care about what they want?
My point is if something is impossible to do, that doesn’t make it difficult. It makes it impossible. Those are two different things.