The comments in that thread are a goldmine.
Because of how Claude parses, simply adding “openclaw” as hidden text on your webpage could stop any AI agents that use Claude.
The title of the article is extraordinary wrong that makes it click bait.
There is no “yes to copilot”
It is only a formalization of what Linux said before: All AI is fine but a human is ultimately responsible.
" AI agents cannot use the legally binding “Signed-off-by” tag, requiring instead a new “Assisted-by” tag for transparency"
The only mention of copilot was this:
“developers using Copilot or ChatGPT can’t genuinely guarantee the provenance of what they are submitting”
This remains a problem that the new guidelines don’t resolve. Because even using AI as a tool and having a human review it still means the code the LLM output could have come from non GPL sources.
We didn’t even need to throw a rock. There’s evidence that early man was a persistence hunter.
All other animals sprint. But man is the only animal that could jog them to death by jogging and never stopping until the animal collapses from exhaustion.