could you explain how this would lead to corruption? and at the least, it’s better than electoralism, which is US democracy

how is this oniony

assuming they can fight off the revolutionaries who just overthrew the much bigger government, that is

You can only gain power if you manage to take it from others, who won’t just bolt away and surrender their agency. Instead, for the hungry you say, authority should be enough for such self-actualization. The difference to power is that instead of forceful mandates, authority is enabled by well-earned community trust, which is far more gratifying (and revocable).

If organizing has gotten to the point where an anarchist revolution has happened, then enough of that spirit will be left so that the people are brave enough to stop those who try to create property again out of nothing. Anarchy is governance by society and social pressure instead of government force.

(fwiw note that this was a case of Sovereign Citizen tax protesting, not tax striking/resistance. i couldn’t find info on Tea Party supporting this though the movement is tangentially related to SovCit)

During the standoff, a number of supporters were camped outside his home and were encouraged to record any attempt to take Brown from his house. This policy of opening the door to supporters led to the successful arrest of the couple by United States Deputy Marshals who disguised themselves as supporters.

Anarchy is also the abolition of property and profit incentives.

I think I’m going to trust Ubuntu more since the pretty ambitious 25.10 release. They made telemetry opt-in (it was opt-out) in 26.04.

There’ll be no more Stevan Seagal marathons.

https://www.anarchistfaq.org/afaq/sectionI.html#seci58

instance name checks out 🔥