• Linearity@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Wtf is wrong with this place, why is everyone fighting
      And why does it seem like they all hate Pewdiepie?

      • MolochAlter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        This is a site populated mostly by the too edgy or too contrarian for Reddit, with the same flaws in incentive systems as Reddit, why are you surprised lol.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        And why does it seem like they all hate Pewdiepie?

        He took a fascist turn during Trump 1 and never really recovered his image. Got into a bunch of weird exploitative shit, not unlike Mr Beast. The most notable being when he tested the Fiverr service and paid five dollars to get Indian freelance actors to laugh and show a sign saying ‘Death to all Jews’.

        After that, he started getting deplatformed and his following fell off considerably. So, like a bunch of other has-been YouTube starlets, he decided to get even more edgy and reactionary, further poisoning his image. It’s the same death spiral Russell Brand and Rob Schneider fell down.

          • Smaile@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            no its just virtue signalers and keyboard warriors remembering hed did a bad thing that one time on the bridge and assumed hes a Nazi now.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              hed did a bad thing that one time

              Far more than the one time. He had a whole routine about exploiting overseas labor to perform humiliating stunts.

              • Smaile@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Nah I’m not going to take a lecturing, each ‘incident’ can v easily have been explained, it’s why a lot of people on this page aren’t taking you guys seriously, your type are to tightly wound up

                • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  each ‘incident’ can v easily have been explained

                  You hear this from serial sexual harassers all the time. Every individual incident has plausible deniability. It’s the trend line that eventually catches up with you.

                  your type are to tightly wound up

                  My type being… big budget advertisers on YouTube?

  • Sips'@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Having such a big influencer as Pewds shout out selfhosting, ad blocking and general privacy improvements is a huge win, no matter what your opinion is of him.

    • cecilkorik@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m always open to somebody’s redemption arc, even if I dislike them. The great thing about people is that we are capable of growth, even if not all of us always grow in the right direction, we always can.

        • MrKoyun@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          …one step at a time, dude. This kind of thinking just serves to make perfect the enemy of good.

          • brachiosaurus@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            It takes 2 minutes to create an account on the fediverse, they are not interested in that, they are on youtube for the profits.

    • brachiosaurus@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      And having a youtube video on lemmy frontpage is a huge ad for google and a missed opportunity for an open alternative to become more popular

      • Sips'@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Dunno about “huge ad” exactly… There arent that many of us here lol.

        • brachiosaurus@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Not huge maybe but for what i care a big smack in the face to this open source and decentralized platform.

    • Magnum, P.I.@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It is true, I think so too. I never really watched any of his content, his racist and toxic comments in the past make it hard to recommend it to anyone, but his two or three tech videos were decent for a normie targeting normies. In total, he is big enough, that I think its a net profit for the cause.

      • NostraDavid@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        his racist and toxic comments in the past make it hard to recommend it to anyone

        He mended his ways, and didn’t do it again. What else do you want him to do, to atone for his sins?

    • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      What concerns me is the implicit association people will make between him and FOSS, and anything they believe about one will carry to the other.

      I have to assume there are already people who hear “Linux” and think “ugh, I wouldn’t touch that with a 10ft pole because I don’t want anything to do with Pewdiepie”. Similarly, if he says something dumb next week, and half his audience abandons him, they’ll likely have a negative outlook on FOSS going forward.

      Either way, I don’t believe FOSS’ staying power comes from meteoric rises following a fad, it comes from a natural immunity to enshittification over time. On the scale of a few of decades, FOSS seems like it’s struggling against proprietary solutions. But just like the general concept of political democracy, I think on the scale of centuries it will become the clear, time-tested, least-bad option. But I digress.

    • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      He helped usher in this new enshittification. He was the Trojan horse. First one to reach a million

        • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          You think not having total control of an organization means he’s free of blame. Would you say that your MAGA uncle doesn’t control Trump so isn’t responsible for his actions.

          Pewdiepie is literally called an influencer. He warped what many young people belief they can become today and that belief is what ushered in a world of influencers chasing the all mighty dollar. That has given all these corporations fuel to create content and that content is stealing our data, eliminating data scarcity and used to influence politics.

          He’s not the cause of it but he was an inflection point and could have went in a different direction to push kids to reject this new paradigm. Instead he was the face of it.

          • real_squids@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            You think not having total control of an organization means he’s free of blame

            I don’t, that’s something you made up about me in your head. I think that YouTube’s business execs would always lead it to where we are now.

            He warped what many young people belief they can become today and that belief is what ushered in a world of influencers chasing the all mighty dollar

            He made gameplay videos. I think that’s the most benign form of “influencing” there can be. I think there are much more damaging channels that had way more sway in shaping this new generation.

            Again, I’m not saying he’s a saint but I do think he’s ultimately insignificant when looking at the causes of and reasoning behind youtube’s enshittification. And I don’t think he would ever go a different direction, just doesn’t seem like the type.

            • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              He laid the groundwork for those shitty influencer. He had the attention of young people who looked up to him. The minute they saw he could make millions by becoming the walking embodiment of a Nascar fender he set the attitudes and aspirations of a generation.

              Would YouTube continue without him? Yes of course.

              Could he have pushed back and created helped influence a generation of kids to reject the selling out of themselves to this influencer culture? Absolutely.

              There were a few influencers in those early days that could have changed things or at least maintained the zeitgeist that we had then. Nobody did. That money was too good. Everything after he made that first million would change how the internet worked.

              He was the inflection point. He could have impacted everything going forward. He could have told kids that these companies were stealing their data. That they were soliciting gamers to use as Trojan horses for what would eventually make everything worse.

              • new_world_odor@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                To call him the inflection point, as if this wasn’t a more complex change emerging over time, is ridiculous. You are clearly speaking from an outside perspective. He has never come close to flashing his wealth or showing a ‘lifestyle’, anything that has came definitively after his peak. The influencer issue was also far more complex. Instagram was the central breeding ground for those types, and twitter was still conversationally relevant.

                Even if he was the inflection point, what now? You expect someone at the center of things to realize their unique position, and then realize the most morally correct thing (to you) to do about it? Patently ridiculous, hindsight is 20/20 when it comes to larger cultural movements like influencers.

                Calling pewdiepie an influencer shows how little you understand that sphere. You have no idea what you’re talking about.

                • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  What is an influencer?

                  Since you said I’m wrong, what is the inflection point that I’m describing?

                  Did I say he flashed his wealth?

                  I do expect people to be aware of their impact, directly and indirectly, especially on kids. The more people you can potentially impact, the greater the responsibility to be aware.

                  Is data collection, exploiting children to sell products, and the consequences of profit-seeking something that we weren’t aware of at the time PewDiePie became famous?

                  I agree PewDiePie didn’t sell things to children. He didn’t need to. He was the product. I’m against commercial pressure on the internet, which seems like a radical concept now. PewDiePie didn’t need to hawk products to kids i know he did a good job with that. But he was the product. He was the point at which kids saw they could become a gamer and help commercial sites collect people’s attention and sell it to advertisers. That model is what broke everything. It turned the internet into cable television 2.0.

                  We already had corporate-approved media that was just a way to sell our attention. The internet, for a brief moment, was something for us. It was as close to a gift economy as we could get. It was the difference between a lawn sprayed with glyphosate to kill anything that wasn’t good old American Texas bluegrass devoid of originality, beauty, or color but looking neat and a lawn allowed to grow wild, full of weeds but also flowers, plants, and life.

                  PewDiePie wouldn’t have been the only one to make money, but he was the first to hit that milestone, and everything changed after that.