Transcript:

Two panel meme.

Top panel: Woman in the front seat of a car screaming at a child in the rear seat. She’s saying “Why can’t you just shutdown?”

Bottom panel: A child screaming “A stop job is running for Session c2 of user … (1:30 / no limit)”

  • ThunderComplex@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    81
    ·
    19 days ago

    Idk if this is a hot take but „no limit“ should straight up not exist. Just set a limit and blow the whole PC up when it takes too long.

    • cley_faye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      17 days ago

      Due to what I call some quirks (but what other people call “good, sane, excellent design decisions”), you can set a hard timeout… that can be flatly ignored by systemd for various reasons that might or might not be obvious. In that case it will happily show you <current timer> / <timeout>, then move to <current timer> / <timeout * 2>, and so on.

      Because that, for some reasons, makes a lot of sense to some people that are not me.

    • thevoidzero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      I’ve never see it, who sets it? I only have two processes that are like it and blth wait for 1:30