• huluvu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Regardless of any ethical considerations you may or may not have about the affected group: where does it lead if exclusion reaches a critical mass in a largely privatised society, making it impossible for a significant number of people to acquire necessary goods or services?

    What exactly would your ideal world look like, and how would one prevent it from devolving into groups segregating by increasingly precise identity- or ideological markers? How would this affect societies and economies at large, if we fully reject the paradox of unlimited tolerance of intolerance? Have you ever tried discussing this with likeminded people and were they able to offer satisfying solutions that could withstand logical examination without requiring religious or otherwise tribal substitutions?

    • iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It means the few businesses who help marginalized groups have a lot more business than the other ones and benefit.

      Furthermore, I believe in canceling bigots and spamming their businesses yelp pages. The government doesn’t need to force people to be good, society still exists