• yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    It’s much more complicated than that. Social media platforms have a TOS that binds them just as much as the user. It’s literally just a contract.

    The social media company also has much more limited rights to terminate such a contract than the user. At least that’s the case in countries with any consumer protection.

    That’s how YouTubers at least in Germany have successfully forced YouTube to reinstate their channel. YouTube failed to prove a violation of their TOS, therefore the contract termination was null and void, therefore the contract is still valid.

    There is no contract when you have entered a restaurant. After you ordered your food, there is a contract and you cannot be kicked out for arbitrary reasons anymore. If you are kicked out for no reason, you can sue for damages (but you cannot force the restaurant to enter any new contracts with you, e.g. another meal).