Using CRISPR-Cas9, scientists engineered a yeast to produce the nutrient feed. Farmers could have it in two years.

  • FUCKING_CUNO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    29 days ago

    This is both great and terrible. Great because “yay bees”, terrible because now they have a synthetic stand in for a natural process which will almost certainly be misused

    Instead of just PLANTING SOME FUCKING FLOWERS

  • nomad@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    29 days ago

    Here in Germany farmers are payed for a strip of each field to be planted with wild flowers instead. They don’t lose money at all and nature keeps a bit of land. Simple and cheap.

  • Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    29 days ago

    The solution is so simple. Crop/pollen diversity. Instead of letting fields lay fallow for crop rotation, they could plant diverse wildflower meadows to improve quality of bee health for the traveling bees that get shipped around for crop rotation. Or the bee keepers themselves that sell the services of their bees, could ensure diverse flower and pollen options when their bees aren’t traveling.

  • motruck@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    And so the house of cards grows by another level. We’ll just modify this to add this missing thing. Never mind why it is missing. 10 years later we are 9 layers deep on plugging holes we’ve created that technological advancements got us out if until they don’t and whoosh the cards come crashing down. The hardiness of nature replaced by the frivolity of man.

    • Pringles@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      Throughout history the human population has only been able to increase thanks to innovation. Irrigation, the wheel, alternating crops, crop distance, keeping disease in check, genetic engineering to increase resistance and crop yields, and this is another innovation in that line. If you want to go back to nature, by all means do.

      I believe the only way forward is through science and innovation and if that means genetically altered food for the bees, then so be it. This with the in combination with limiting roundup should bring the global bee populations back from the brink.

      • racemaniac@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        28 days ago

        You’re quickly glossing over all the issues.

        “human population has only been able to increase thanks to innovation”: and that’s a good thing? What would be wrong with a more manageable human population?

        “If you want to go back to nature, by all means do.”: how? The world has advanced beyond that, it’s clearly not an option.

        “the only way forward is through science and innovation”: if science & innovation is what you call forward, then obviously yes, but that’s just a tautology. What is your measure of “forward”? If it’s power over nature, advancements, … then for sure. If it’s respecting this earth and not long term ruining the entire planet… how sure are you about that?

        “limiting roundup”: ah, an innovation that should be limited. What went wrong that it was globally used before we were sure enough about its side effects? How sure are you about all the current innovations that they don’t have similar issues? How sure are you about this bee superfood not having disastrous long term effects?

        If you ignore all the issues with it though, innovation is incredible for sure!

        • Domitian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          28 days ago

          I would argue the right direction to go forward in is the direction where Billions of People dont starve. Innovation and sustainabillity are not mutually exclusive.

          • racemaniac@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            28 days ago

            Current agricultural progress is mostly about needing as few people as possible for farming, not making enough food for everyone. It’s widely known there is plenty of food, the issues are social as to why some are still hungry, not technological.

            And in the end, we’re on a finite planet, so whichever way you look at it, keeping increasing population numbers has to end somewhere, so the question is not does enough humans exist, but what is enough, and i think there are plenty of arguments thaht we’re overpopulating the earth already.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    Get rid of the large swaths of green fucking grass, which completely useless when one cuts it down. Let the Dandy Lions grow like we do in Europe and plant more native flowers too.

    • phx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      Clover. Clover is great:

      • Lush and green
      • Holds down soil we
      • Soft to walk on
      • Needs less water than grass
      • Needs less mowing
      • Bees love it