I wonder if I’ll ever read a coherent definition of the term “techbro”. Aren’t most KDE (and other FOSS) developers also men interested in technology? If that isn’t the definition of “techbro”, then what is?
If I don’t know what that means I’m fighting against, I won’t be fighting against “techbros”, not even using that term. I might still fight against specific things they are doing…
in this particular context;
Someone, typically an investor, who is convinced that their “tech” of choice (AI) is the future, despite the well documented cost and not-so-long-concerns of pursuing said “tech” (ie Winning the “AI Race” whatever that is), to the determent of well being of the environment and/or humanity.
I wonder if I’ll ever read a coherent definition of the term “techbro”. Aren’t most KDE (and other FOSS) developers also men interested in technology? If that isn’t the definition of “techbro”, then what is?
Do not stop the war against techbros simply because we can’t settle a perfect, concrete, legal definition of them.
If I don’t know what that means I’m fighting against, I won’t be fighting against “techbros”, not even using that term. I might still fight against specific things they are doing…
Id say the “bro” in techbros is more derogatory in this definition… like a techflog perhaps.
in this particular context; Someone, typically an investor, who is convinced that their “tech” of choice (AI) is the future, despite the well documented cost and not-so-long-concerns of pursuing said “tech” (ie Winning the “AI Race” whatever that is), to the determent of well being of the environment and/or humanity.
Investor? The word you’re looking for is grifter
OK, if it is intended mainly as a description of investors and other “business” enthusiasts, then I agree with fighting against what they want.
Investor Enthusiast, but yes… Also, Companies aren’t people, their CEO and Board of Directors are. And those would also qualify.