• acido@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    nothing a social media ban for <13 years old kids can’t solve, am I right?

    • BestBouclettes@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      24 hours ago

      There’s a reason why Meta is lobbying for age verification. They need it to be compliant with the law, without the accountability that goes with it.

      What they need is an absolutely gigantic non-negotiable fine.

      • viov@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Multiple non-negotiate fines from multiple different groups in different lawsuits

      • XLE@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        18 hours ago

        The annoying thing is, meta already knows a bunch of its users are minors, but it refuses to act on that information. It’s like they’re waiting until they can impose universal surveillance on everyone before it bothers doing anything.

        Never mind that many things (like self-harm content on Instagram) should be banned regardless of the viewer’s age, and that plenty of this regulation should be left up to parents anyway

      • eleijeep@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        23 hours ago

        I don’t think it’s just about accountability, I think it’s also about being able to charge advertisers more for verified-human eyeballs.