• DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    130
    ·
    2 months ago

    “might stop anyone from 3D printing guns”

    I can guarantee you that it won’t even do that.

    • mctoasterson@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      62
      ·
      2 months ago

      It absolutely won’t do that. You know how many millions of early generation Prusa and Ender 3 printers are in the US? Many of these models have no internet connectivity whatsoever and print from SD card.

      What that means is they will also try to incorporate spyware into your CAD and/or slicer software, which is even more invasive.

      This is a anti-privacy bill.

      • evadersnack@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 months ago

        It won’t stop anyone buying or importing innocuous machinery parts like 2020 aluminium extrusions or GT2 belts either. There are mature generic 3D printer designs out there that outperforms RepRap i3 bedslingers.

        E.g. https://vorondesign.com/voron2.4

      • Ghoelian@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        I don’t even understand how they imagine this will work. Most printers are certainly not powerful enough to do real 3d object detection. Even if they forced slicers to include this, just fork OrcaSlicer and take it back out. Actually a lot of printers run open source software as well, so we can just fork klipper of it ever comes to that.

    • iocase@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s like making a normal printer that’s mandated by the government to never print dicks

      • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I mean normal printers will not let you print money. That’s what gave these idiots the idea to begin with I’d wager. But there are orders of magnitude in difference in difficulty between making a piece of software capable of autonomously recognizing a few existing designs of dollar bills and one that can tell a working gun part that can take a shape that can vary almost infinitely from other objects that can also take nearly infinite shapes.

        • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          2 months ago

          They don’t recognize bills. They recognize a pattern of tiny yellow rings in the bills, the Eurion constellation, which can barely be seen by the eye. This supposedly will stop copiers and printers from scanning or printing any document that has these.

          Bypassing these is trivial.

    • PattyMcB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      It absolutely will not stop some people. But those are not the ones committing gun crimes

    • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      No, it won’t.

      I suppose they don’t care because the purpose of the laws is not to prevent the printing of guns, that’s only the justification.