• Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is such an overwhelming power grab in line with all the other crap they are currently pushing like disabling Manifest V2. The US urgently needs to ramp up their antitrust legislation, or else - if you extrapolate the current trajectories - they might soon be in a position where the US government has to do what google says and not the other way around

  • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 months ago

    Remember when Apple were supposed to be the bad guys and Google/Android were “one of us”?

      • dan1101@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Just ordered a Pixel phone today. Between this and mandatory Gemini AI, I’m leaving Android.

      • HarkMahlberg@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        My phone doesn’t have any custom ROM support yet, so I guess I’m screwed? I love F-Droid, but this missive amounts to just ragebait for people who don’t have Pixel devices.

        • bryndos@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          Buy a phone that lineage os support then. Way more options than pixels. Pretty cheap used, you just have to accept one from a few years ago. and make sure that any required bootloader unlock from oem can still be done.

    • prism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      Best way is to not include it in the first place by using another ROM. If that’s not an option, you can always remove it via root. It may also be possible to use ADB/Shizuku to get rid of it, but Google could add checks to prevent ADB from removing it. Then again apps installed via ADB aren’t subject to verification.

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Or leave Android altogether and get a Linux phone. You’ll have more control but it won’t be as slick.

        • Aproposnix@scribe.disroot.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          Its not just about being slick. Real functionality will be lost as well as the lost ecosystem of android apps. I think Jolla is trying to bridge this divide by providing some proprietary android layer.

          But yeah, mobile Linux is defintely the goal.

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      The implementation about to be done is actually just another smaller step to trying to be completely locked down.

      In the same way you have to go and allow developer options to install apks outside of the play store now, this new thing will take you a couple more clicks to enable it and have a one time 24 hour waiting period before you can install whatever you want.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      At first Google does plan to offer something called “advanced flow” that will let you install what you want. But this doesn’t address the chilling effect for developers (some are just getting out of Android rather than registering and paying Google), or the censorship power it hands to Google to make “undesirable” apps harder to obtain and install. And there’s no guarantee they won’t just withdraw “advanced flow” one day.

      https://developer.android.com//developer-verification/guides/faq#advanced-flow

      The best way to avoid it is by installing an OS that doesn’t include the developer verification component.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 months ago

    For a long time I thought side loading was something special because it didn’t say “installing software”, so it must be some very special procedure that is required for mobile devices because of limitations or requirements with the hardware, right?

    Yeah no, it was just a made up marketing term to push people away from installing their own software on their own devices

    Fuck all big tech companies

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      It night as well be if you’re trying to do something it doesn’t like. I created the registry entry in my VM and it still keeps turning itself back on.