I find they fail a lot and spit out code with lots of problems more often than not.
Studies also show that humans have better quality output and can apply reasoning and logic where LLMs cannot. LLMs will just hallucinate to fill blanks… Its not even close to prime time output.
This is irrelevant as CEO’s and shareholders keep screaming “moar AI!”. Engineers know limits of the tool but are forced to ignore those. So yes,LLM is comming for your job but not because it can do it,but because it is perceived to be cheaper.
yes
I find they fail a lot and spit out code with lots of problems more often than not.
Studies also show that humans have better quality output and can apply reasoning and logic where LLMs cannot. LLMs will just hallucinate to fill blanks… Its not even close to prime time output.
Not to mention very insecure code output as well…
Its not “AI” its hype around text prediction.
This is irrelevant as CEO’s and shareholders keep screaming “moar AI!”. Engineers know limits of the tool but are forced to ignore those. So yes,LLM is comming for your job but not because it can do it,but because it is perceived to be cheaper.
It wont be cheap if it fails