• Soup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    And out of the people who do need them, vans are still a much better way to go for many of them. Vans which have at least a margainally better field of view with their short, sloped hoods.

    • TurboWafflz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 months ago

      I know someone who insists that a pickup truck is more practical and her example is “you can lift a bookshelf over the side of a pickup truck instead of having to put it in the back like a van”. Apparently it’s more practical to lift something like 4 feet off the ground to the side of a pickup truck bed instead of like 1 foot to the floor of a van

      • Soup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Similarly, I know people who bought F-150s for motorycles after going to the track only one time. We worked with actual consistent track-goers who each had vans. I used one of theirs to move my bike to the shop, and it was really funny watching them struggle with a small Ninja 250.

        People with truck brain are so fuckin’ stupid.

      • Soup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        There’s still an issue there with pedestrian safety, but it’s definitely better than an F-150 for sure. And maybe putting the driver up front will make them less inclined to be douchebags, too.

    • rants_unnecessarily@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      And it’s not just the field of view, it’s how the impact occurs. On a lower, sloped hood you bounce over the bonnet instead of a head-on bang with a higher, vertical, one.