• Blaster M@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    This keeps getting buried by the algos, but I see this requirement as a real problem. Unreliable tech that stops your car if it thinks you’re not driving right… and already current implementations have lots of false positive actions. Yeah, nope. This won’t go well.

  • Turret3857@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    The federal government promises this surveillance saves 9,000-10,000 lives annually.

    Wikipedia says roughly 42k people died of car related injuries in 2022.

    So, the government is promising that this brand new technology that has not had any field testing whatsoever is going to reduce car related deaths by 23%?

    They’re lucky theres no way to sue over a broken promise.

    Here’s a great way to reduce car deaths to near 0%

    functional public transit.

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s not about reducing road fatalities.

      It’s about surveilling political enemies.

      It’ll have sudden false positives the moment you talk about how bad the government is. It’ll suddenly appear in counter-terrorism surveillance.

  • Yliaster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Nooo, you’re a conspiracy theorist and a tinfoil hat that needs to touch grass.

    hope more people realize this BS