• 秦始皇帝@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    16 hours ago

    You clearly don’t understand the purpose of the firewall and the online surveillance is no more than any other country but at least our government is accountable to us as opposed to owned by capital.

      • RiverRock@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        You are literally talking to a Chinese person from China, smug liberal dipshittery knows no bounds

        • khannie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Then they fit the second part, living in ignorance. Online surveillance there is measurably worse.

          Edit: just for clarity, I’m not “china bad” in my worldview but claims they their online surveillance is the same as elsewhere is utter nonsense and either from ignorance or indoctrination.

          You think they’re posting on Lemmy without a VPN?

          • 秦始皇帝@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            The firewall was created to foster and protect China’s fledgling digital infrastructure and data sovereignty. Many countries regulate foreign platforms and data flows. China built its own ecosystem instead of depending on foreign companies. We have seen what happens when foreign platforms operate without local oversight: Facebook facilitating genocide in Myanmar, coordinated anti-vax disinformation campaigns in Southeast Asia, algorithm-driven radicalization. The firewall makes those kinds of external influence operations harder or close to impossible to run at scale. I support it and so do many others as the alternative is plain to see. Also everyone has a VPN we’re not living in ignorance it is in fact people like yourself who are massively ignorant about us and our country.

              • 秦始皇帝@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                2 hours ago

                Ive been to your country. Many times. The ignorance call out holds no weight for me. I’ve lived the online surveillance and lack of access to sites or services I wanted. Hell even SSH connections are speed limited and frequently get a TCP reset to mess with them. Why? Because they can tunnel HTTP traffic.

                The firewall again isn’t a surveillance tool it’s a blacklist that protects us from the very clear worse option which is a US controlled digital infrastructure. Also you vacationing here really doesn’t do much to assuage ignorance. Plenty of EuroAmerikans vacation across developing countries and are still massively ignorant on how they actually functions. I’d go a step further and say most EuroAmerikans don’t even know how their own country really functions as “lived experience” is only a small part of the puzzle.

                It’s not just surveillance, it’s control. you continuously avoid talking about how end to end encryption is not an option

                I’m assuming the choice of the word continuously is an artefact from an LLM considering end to end encryption was only brought up once. Also I very clearly didn’t avoid talking about it I simply pointed out that the most common ones such as WhatsApp are mostly a mix of insecure software and lies, also are largely irrelevant considering the NSA backdoors on every piece of deployed tech in the western hemisphere

                • khannie@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  LLM? No, continuously was a deliberate choice. I don’t see what’s wrong with it.

                  I’m using the example of end to end encryption to show how online surveillance there is measurably worse.

                  Your assertion was that online surveillance there is the same as elsewhere. That’s ridiculous. That’s the starting point and it’s what I’m sticking to. Lack of E2E is just such an obvious example of how it’s worse.

                  You’re making assumptions about back doors in all Western tech. China has them.

                  I can use any E2E encrypted platform I choose. You can’t use any. That’s worse.

                  • 秦始皇帝@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    2 hours ago

                    You’re making assumptions about back doors in all Western tech.

                    It’s not an assumption it’s proven real

                    PRISM: Allowed the NSA to access data from major tech companies, including emails, documents, and photos.

                    XKeyscore: Enables the NSA to analyze global internet data, making it easy to track individuals’ online activities.

                    Tempora: The UK’s GCHQ tapped fiber-optic cables to collect vast amounts of data, sharing it with the NSA.

                    Boundless Informant: A data visualization tool that documented the NSA’s global data collection effort.

                    All revealed by snowden. If you think that they stopped any of this or this was all they were doing you are so incredibly naive it’s amazing you lived past 12.

                    All I can say is cope.

      • 秦始皇帝@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I was born and raised here. The VPN is for the firewall which has many reasons to exist and I support, also they’re not illegal. Criticising the government is super common but mostly over mundane stuff because that’s what people care about (there’s a reason the approval even according to Harvard is 95+%). You people are always so arrogant while being so uninformed it’s amazing.

        • khannie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Making a statement that online surveillance there is no different from elsewhere will get you that kind of response tbh. It is measurably worse.

          • 秦始皇帝@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            It simply isn’t. Remember snowden? The NSA? TAO? Pegasus? Our government is simply more open and honest with us (might be a side effect of having real democracy as opposed to a charade put on by bought candidates every 4 years). Also before you say that’s just America, Europe are American vassal states all of these and more (since this is just what has leaked) are deployed against Europeans too and intel is shared in deals like five eyes.

              • 秦始皇帝@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                The method of voting isn’t what makes it real democracy it’s the class content of the state and the fact that voting is a ritual for representatives that will only ever serve capital as opposed to voting being a single part of a daily system of feedback and interaction with deputies embedded in the grassroots situation who need accomplishments (to solve our problems) to go for higher offices. There’s a reason the number of billionaires in China is shrinking while public services and social safety nets are constantly seeing investment while in Europe and America austerity for the masses and tax cuts for the rich is law.

                End to end encrypted

                Nice vibes based analysis sort of redundant when they have backdoors on every piece of technology deployed there or the fact that most end to end encrypted messages are some mix of lying and insecure like WhatsApp.

                • khannie@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  I use signal and I’m free to. I’m confident it’s secure. Confident enough that my wife can send me a titty pic without someone looking at it. I would not do that with WeChat.

                  You call out a straw man about it being back doored when you’ve no idea that’s the case but we’re certain it is in China.

                  You go ahead and try to create an end to end encrypted messaging platform there and see what happens.

                  Hell… use pgp in your WeChat. See what happens.

                  • 秦始皇帝@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    2 hours ago

                    I use signal and I’m free to. I’m confident it’s secure. Confident enough that my wife can send me a titty pic without someone looking at it.

                    I hate to break it to you but if the government want to see that titty pic if it’s on either of your phones or any other device they can and likely have.

                    You call out a straw man about it being back doored when you’ve no idea that’s the case but we’re certain it is in China.

                    Again remember snowden? If you live in the western hemisphere the US and Israeli intelligence apparatus owns all of your tech that’s the unfortunate truth you need to reckon with.

      • 秦始皇帝@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        To us. There’s a reason that even from Harvard’s research the government has a 95+% approval.

        Direct elections reach the township and county levels where voters choose deputies to local people’s congresses. These grassroots deputies constitute the overwhelming majority of all deputies nationwide. Advancement to higher levels requires proven service at lower rungs, ensuring every national deputy has worked up from local material conditions and remains accountable to the masses below.

        Grassroots legislative liaison stations and community consultation channels ensure mass input shapes policy at every stage, making democracy a daily practice not a periodic (meaningless) ritual. Whole-process people’s democracy embeds consultation and pilot programs into governance: policies are tested locally, refined through mass feedback, then scaled nationally. This grounds decisions in what we want and need.

        All 55 ethnic minorities hold guaranteed representation in the NPC. Farmers and labourers comprise roughly 15% of deputies while professionals and technical personnel make up the remainder.

        Even besides all that if you just look at what the Chinese government does as opposed to those owned by capital. Mass poverty alleviation, anticorruption at all levels, massive investment in socially profitable but monetarily unprofitable public services, deflating the housing bubble. These are not the actions of a government only looking out for a select few.

        And also the CPC has over 100million members since 2024 that 1 in 14 people are party members not to mind those who aren’t but are active in consulting due to their position such as most engineers and scientists.