cm0002@literature.cafe to Privacy@programming.dev · 1 day agoProton has respond on redditlemmy.mlimagemessage-square66linkfedilinkarrow-up1191arrow-down11
arrow-up1190arrow-down1imageProton has respond on redditlemmy.mlcm0002@literature.cafe to Privacy@programming.dev · 1 day agomessage-square66linkfedilink
minus-squareHeartyOfGlass@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up61arrow-down9·24 hours ago “You’re right to raise this…” “… and that’s on us.” Has the same kind of simpering tone you’d get out of an LLM.
minus-squareSidyctism II.@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 hours agoMeanwhile im positively surprised that there is no “sorry you are offended”-BS at all in this statement.
minus-squarecalcopiritus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·3 hours agoWhich doesn’t mean it was written by an LLM. This has been standard corporate speak from before LLMs existed.
minus-squaredouglasg14b@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up34arrow-down2·20 hours agoWhat do you think LLMs were trained off of, my friend?
minus-squarerefalo@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down2·18 hours agoJust curious, what could they have possibly done instead that would satisfy you?
minus-squareHeartyOfGlass@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down3·15 hours ago… not used an LLM to write their apology? I mean, I’m satisfied. This indicates to me they don’t care. That’s all I need to hear.
minus-squarerefalo@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·3 hours agoThere is no proof they used an LLM. Plus, LLMs are trained on human text anyway, who actually talk like this… it’s not like LLMs invented their own way of speaking. Would you have preferred no apology at all?
minus-squareHeartyOfGlass@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 hours agoMy preference is for companies to not use LLMs for public communication.
minus-squarewyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·15 hours agoAnd, the scholarly applause of us anons, of course. ☝🏼
Has the same kind of simpering tone you’d get out of an LLM.
Meanwhile im positively surprised that there is no “sorry you are offended”-BS at all in this statement.
Which doesn’t mean it was written by an LLM. This has been standard corporate speak from before LLMs existed.
What do you think LLMs were trained off of, my friend?
Just curious, what could they have possibly done instead that would satisfy you?
… not used an LLM to write their apology?
I mean, I’m satisfied. This indicates to me they don’t care. That’s all I need to hear.
There is no proof they used an LLM. Plus, LLMs are trained on human text anyway, who actually talk like this… it’s not like LLMs invented their own way of speaking.
Would you have preferred no apology at all?
My preference is for companies to not use LLMs for public communication.
And, the scholarly applause of us anons, of course. ☝🏼