Btw
It would be better to prove that it is secure.
If you think about last year, for example (That applies to Qualcomm, so you’d have to check what hardware is installed. ) —CVE-2026-25262(But it’s only now making headlines)—the question remains: what hasn’t been discovered yet?
The focus is still on what has been discovered; the question remains: what has not yet been discovered?
And you still need firmware you can trust. You can’t trust Qualcomm.
Yoti is a British company headquartered in London that operates age verification and digital identity services
Don’t the Brits have very strong defamation laws? Seems like an easy lawsuit to win.
I mean… GrapheneOS is here to do exactly the opposite of that. Lol. I mean… Fuck Yoti but like ¯\(ツ)/¯
Btw It would be better to prove that it is secure. If you think about last year, for example (That applies to Qualcomm, so you’d have to check what hardware is installed. ) —CVE-2026-25262(But it’s only now making headlines)—the question remains: what hasn’t been discovered yet?
Oh look, grapheneOS was vulnerable… but it’s been fixed now https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/35355-details-on-the-may-2026-android-security-bulletin (not same CVE)
https://forum.torproject.org/t/enabling-grapheneos-protections-causes-tor-browser-for-android-to-break/21535 lol
The focus is still on what has been discovered; the question remains: what has not yet been discovered? And you still need firmware you can trust. You can’t trust Qualcomm.
Dont forget the whole infrastructure. https://youtu.be/fM5w7bFNvWI
GrapheneOS: Our Daily Honeypot. You can’t trust any cell phone. The operating system doesn’t matter. 🤣