Yes I did. Twice now to make sure I didn’t read over something. But I also read the original GitHub PR while it was still open. And what you linked is just an opinion on the situation.
I’m on the side of the maintainer. Always have been, always will. You want to be politically correct? Go into politics. Or at least wait until they start translating and branding. There’s no need to go and change something that meaningless. It shows you actively went and searched for it, instead of actually helping out the project or staying out of their way.
You clearly did not read what I linked. There’s more than that to this situation.
Yes I did. Twice now to make sure I didn’t read over something. But I also read the original GitHub PR while it was still open. And what you linked is just an opinion on the situation.
I’m on the side of the maintainer. Always have been, always will. You want to be politically correct? Go into politics. Or at least wait until they start translating and branding. There’s no need to go and change something that meaningless. It shows you actively went and searched for it, instead of actually helping out the project or staying out of their way.
You missed the “followup” section then, twice.
Since it’s so difficult, let me help you out: article 1, article 2.
I’m starting to think that the quote at the end of the article I originally shared applies to you too.
God you’re obnoxious.