• DudleyMason@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    Until they get people comfortable with that. Then it’ll be porn that’s deemed “degrading” or depictions of BDSM, or whatever they think they can sell you next. People who want to stop porn want to stop all porn. People who aren’t religious psychos who fall for this kind of bullshit aren’t really better than the religious psychos in any practical sense.

    Signed, A guy who hates step porn, and is really pissed off to have to defend it.

    • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Opposing this isn’t defending step porn - it’s opposing illegalizing using minors in porn.

      If it were actually about banning some kind of consensual porn between adults, then you’d be defending step porn by opposing it.

      • DudleyMason@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        Opposing this is about opposing the normalization of porn bans. Making porn with kids is already illegal most everywhere, and making porn where someone pretends to be a kid is already illegal in the UK.

        Defending this is defending backdoor theocracy.

        Side note: dibs on Backdoor Theocracy as a band name…

        • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 days ago

          Opposing this is about opposing the normalization of porn bans.

          So you think porn with minors should be legal? Personally, I think that being illegal is a good thing and calling it “theocracy” is fucking stupid.